this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
173 points (95.8% liked)

Linux

48287 readers
637 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Which one(s) and why?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago (10 children)

Is Manjaro good if I want in on this Arch goodness but don't want to spend hours configuring stuff? Coming from Fedora

[–] Haven5341@feddit.de 4 points 9 months ago

I haven't used Manjaro myself but I heard that it is not as good as Arch. Rumors I heard where that it is not as solid as vanilla Arch. YMMV.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

Endeavour is better for that, after the install you'll have plain arch but with a bunch of stuff installed and already set up

[–] neo@lemmy.comfysnug.space 3 points 9 months ago

If you plan to use the AUR, absolutely not.

If you don't plan to use the AUR it's probably fine, but I haven't used it personally in the last few years so I'm not sure.

[–] nexussapphire@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

I really have bad luck with Manjaro, even when I don't use the aur it always breaks on me. I just stick to arch, I started with it and I'm sticking with it.

[–] chepycou@rcsocial.net 2 points 9 months ago

@SubArcticTundra @Haven5341 I personally think Manjaro is a false good idea.

You'll have an “out of date” system (i.e., one-month-old) but packages from the AUR which are made for the up-to-date system.

Quite a nightmare to use IMO (and that's not talking about Manjaro leadership and certificates problems)

[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

I've been running it on my work laptop for 6 years at this point and I've had no major issues I couldn't solve.

Having said that, I recently switched my gaming rig over to endeavour and it's been great.

[–] million@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I haven’t used it personally but I’ve seen a lot of folks bad mouthing Manjaro.

Lots of complaints of instability and it being poorly run project. One of the more objective complaints I’ve read is they have a slower release process so security fixes take longer then Arch.

[–] WeLoveCastingSpellz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No. Manjaro is more likely to break than arch because they hold of updating their pakages. What you are looking for is EndavourOS. I consider it to be "the new manjaro"

[–] Nyanix@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

I've been daily driving Manjaro for 4 years without any issues. Generally speaking I'd recommend seeing if there is a flatpak for an app before using AUR. I don't update as soon as updates are out though, so usually any issues there may have been have been shmoothed over before I get to it.

[–] Luella@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 months ago

I've been using manjaro for around a year. It broke on me once, probably my fault, idk. I enjoy it! I've distro hopped many places and a year is a long time for me, so much about it is right for me. You'll certainly get a worthy experience of what arch is capable of, I believe.

That being said, I plan on swapping to arch really soon.