this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
142 points (91.8% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
142
The highest funded plagiarist is probably this AI ethicist (andreasplagiarism.wordpress.com)
submitted 9 months ago by tulipas@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Yes, but it's still wrong, if true. Plagiarism isn't just unethical, it's punitive in most places. I don't see anything bad about calling it out.

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 7 points 9 months ago

Oh absolutely. And this being in academia, they likely will lose their job over it - like that Harvard professor who was accused of a highly similar form of plagiarism (borrowing long stretches of text while failing to cite the original source material). I was pointing out the absurdity of not doing that for politicians and CEOs:-(.

[–] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

plagiarism is an academic crime.

failing to cite a source is completely amoral.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

No, it's also possible to be sued for plagiarism, so defacto punitive.

I would also err on the side of ethics versus morality for something that doesn't directly and intentionally do harm on its outset.

[–] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 2 points 9 months ago

>would also err on the side of ethics versus morality

this makes no sense.

[–] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

that doesnt mean its immoral.

and as far as i can tell, its not even true. you can be sued for copyright infringement but plagiarism is not codified.