this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
38 points (81.7% liked)

Memes

45704 readers
1156 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

But you and I did NOT. I see a lot of people online who can't make the distinction.

EDIT: Thanks for replies, all. Some good conversation here

[–] nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Of course I’m gonna assume good faith from you here, but I feel like some people boil down issues like this to “well I mean I didn’t do it so stop complaining”, and that’s wildly reductive and irresponsible at minimum.

Arguing the situation in this way sidesteps the uncomfortable and inconvenient reality that the United States is yet still occupying native land, whether it be Hawai’i, Alaska, or the contiguous territories. Yes it’s entirely possible that mine or your ancestors didn’t perpetuate these things as immigration is and has always been ongoing, but the point everyone misses is that we are still here.

I couldn’t possibly imagine belittling natives for acknowledging the fact that their land was taken from them by force. Some real colonialist shit.

[–] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I feel you, and also acknowledge it is a hairy subject on a grand scale.

I also try to frame the issue in the actual, real moment. I try my damndest to do as little harm as humanly possible to anyone. Should I be forced to give money to someone affected? Land? Should I be punished?

Who benefits? A grandson of someone displaced? A great great grandson? Whole family trees? How do you make shit like this right after so much time?

Mostly, I'm trying to encourage thought and discussion. Fundamentally, I think people should be judged on their own merits and actions, not their lineage.

[–] nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

That will always be an issue until the US government actually has real communication and cooperation with native people.

I don’t necessarily think that citizens of occupied land are automatically responsible for the past actions of a government (not to say that’s what you implied), but said government that committed the atrocities is. As far as the other part of the equation, I suppose the beneficiaries should be determined by the natives themselves.

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

The outcome needs to be negotiated and yes, the Tax Payer should foot the bill for the redress for the actions of the State and individual wealthy Families should foot the bill for the crimes their wealth stems from. For example: the entirety of Oklahoma's rather impressively inhumane treatment of the Native Tribes needs to be dealt with as the People that profited from the malfeasance are still holding the proceeds of those crimes.

[–] rug_burn@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So by that logic, the Turks should give Constantinople back to the Romans?

[–] nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago

False equivalence, that’s an entirely different historical context. Things can apply to one situation and not another

[–] Anonymousllama@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

we are still here

Yes, people don't leave occupied land. It's never happened historically and certainly won't happen now, that's the point of occupation. People can acknowledge what happened but in practical terms thinking that somehow all native land will be returned is just naive.

[–] nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Oh well of course, at this point in time it’s been made extremely clear that natives will be getting absolutely no land back, even unoccupied land in the plains for example. There’s no major figures in government even remotely speaking on this stuff in a substantial way, so it may as well never happen. Fucked up stuff on top of all the other fucked up stuff.

And also to be fair, implying that most anyone here believes that all land should be returned is pretty naive in and of itself - there are absolutely more options than ALL OF THE LAND and NONE OF THE LAND

[–] Neato@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That doesn't mean everyone living on stolen land gets a pass just because they weren't the ones to steal it. They have an obligation to make it right.

[–] SquareBear@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How do you propose this be done? FAIRLY?

[–] IMongoose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

My town just voted to give some land back to native American descendants by buying it from the current owners.

[–] Prunebutt@feddit.de -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know, this might sound crazy, but: Listening to the native Americans?

[–] ElmiHalt@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You don't have to listen to the dead, have you? Just sayin'

[–] Prunebutt@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

The American genocide wasn't as thorough as you think it was.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Just sayin' but there are still several native tribes still existing across the Americas. We can talk to them.

[–] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Define "make it right". And for who, exactly?

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

Both sides must come to an agreement that both agree to, without coercion by sword. All involved.