Blapoo

joined 1 year ago
[–] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

I take it you haven't seen the recent advancements in both robotics and LLM powered agents

[–] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I feel you, and also acknowledge it is a hairy subject on a grand scale.

I also try to frame the issue in the actual, real moment. I try my damndest to do as little harm as humanly possible to anyone. Should I be forced to give money to someone affected? Land? Should I be punished?

Who benefits? A grandson of someone displaced? A great great grandson? Whole family trees? How do you make shit like this right after so much time?

Mostly, I'm trying to encourage thought and discussion. Fundamentally, I think people should be judged on their own merits and actions, not their lineage.

[–] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Define "make it right". And for who, exactly?

[–] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (17 children)

But you and I did NOT. I see a lot of people online who can't make the distinction.

EDIT: Thanks for replies, all. Some good conversation here

[–] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless we're talking protesting or voting. Then they're asleep.

[–] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Eh. I don't buy it.

[–] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, but that's the thing. Training isn't copying. It's pattern recognition. If you train a model "The dog says woof" and then ask a model "What does the dog say", it's not guaranteed to say "woof".

Similarly, just because a model was trained on Harry Potter, all that means is it has a good corpus of how the sentences in that book go.

Thus the distinction. Can I train on a comment section discussing the book?

[–] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

We have to distinguish between LLMs

  • Trained on copyrighted material and
  • Outputting copyrighted material

They are not one and the same