this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
-4 points (48.0% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3168 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] romp_2_door@lemmy.world 72 points 7 months ago (2 children)

mastodon is far, far, far more interesting than bluesky

this article is literally an ad piece

[–] livus@kbin.social 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

[Removed by author due to stupidity of comment]

[–] Spotlight7573@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The author definitely is on the fediverse: @mmasnick@mastodon.social

The article may be fairly positive about Bluesky but how Bluesky separates out various functions like feeds, moderation/labeling, and data storage/portability is a definite advantage that I think should be discussed.

[–] livus@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

@Spotlight7573 thanks for the heads up. I'm an idiot.

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If you think Mike Masnick does not spend enough time on the Fediverse, you do not spend enough time on the Fediverse.

[–] livus@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I was being a bit of an oblivious dick in my comment.

I still disagree with him though.

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You're not required to agree with him. But if your disagreement with the headline is stopping you from reading the article, you're missing out. There's some useful ideas described which Fedi-coders would do well to take notice of.

[–] livus@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You're right and I have since read the article properly.

I'm not a coder, just a casual, but it's interesting, though I still disagree that it's a good way to go.

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 1 points 7 months ago

What is there to disagree with? He's describing what looks like a very good system for federation (especially moderation), not telling anyone which way to go.

[–] mmasnick@mastodon.social 3 points 7 months ago

@romp_2_door @psychothumbs i'm curious what makes you think it's "an ad." There are plenty of things in the piece that might be useful for thinking about for ActivityPub/fediverse.