Technology

59589 readers

3394 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

582

The slow death of Twitter is measured in disasters like the Baltimore bridge collapse (www.vox.com)

submitted 8 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

118 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Twitter, now X, was once a useful site for breaking news. The Baltimore bridge collapse shows those days are long gone.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Seraph@kbin.social 133 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I'd argue it was a good place for FAST news. For a lot of major events you can find posts and videos from users before the media releases anything, which is kind of a first for humanity at least in terms of accessibility.

Now, if you're looking for ACCURATE news...

[–] tal@lemmy.today 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'd say that it was useful to gather sources that had to be vetted for accuracy. Honestly, I'd also say it made a good source for the media, where they'd have the job of vetting it and putting out material with more delay but also more accuracy.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 months ago

Yep I heard that it was great for journalists looking for info on a developing story. You could usually follow a hashtag around to find videos from different angles and witnesses to follow up with / interview.

Hopefully that builds up on the new platforms too

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Its specific speed/accuracy tradeoff made it a very good fit for news which you need to know quickly, but had low stakes if it was incorrect. A great example of this transit delays/cancellations, where you probably don't care about the specific reason why a train is delayed and just want alternative options asap.

It was often much more effective to directly follow transit agencies and/or workers for info, rather than use their official website.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee -4 points 8 months ago

It was good for fast news in the same way that I can multiply long numbers fast by always saying 62 immediately.