this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
487 points (99.0% liked)

Linux

48310 readers
645 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 96 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Lasse is the original maintainer of XZ, they have been placed back in their position as sole maintainer.

"Jia Tan" was the person who slipped the backdoor into XZ and is now banned.

Lasse has already fixed abd removed the backdoor.

XZ itself is critical software everyone uses (its one of the main compression/decompression programs used on linux)

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Yes but damage seems to be done. Distros are talking or have moved off of it to zstd.

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There are some, probably. But any exodus will be slow. Xz isn't useless because it was dangerous once.

[–] intrepid@lemmy.ca 14 points 7 months ago

Besides, XZ isn't the only project in such a danger. Banning doesn't solve that problem. They need to put in more funding and eyes.

[–] Calyhre@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

I would argue this might make xz safer mid-term. So much eyes on it. I’m not familiar with other solutions, but who’s to say the bad actor won’t try a similar trick elsewhere

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Zstd and xz fullfil different needs. Xz take more time to compress and is faster to decompress as far as I know.

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago

XZ is a slog to compress and decompress but compresses a bit smaller than zstd.

zstd is quite quick to compress, very quick to decompress, scales to many cores (vanilla xz is single-core only) and scales a lot further in the quicker end of the compression speed <-> file size trade-off spectrum while using the same format.