this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
319 points (97.9% liked)

Greentext

4459 readers
1248 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 85 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I can see some cities definitely cutting you a break on mooring fees as it could be a very attractive tourist draw and OP is correct that once they are clapped out big cruise liners are VERY cheap (kinda) but they vary between 70,000 tons up to over 200,000 tons and lets assume a scrap value of $50 per ton and a 100,000 ton ship you're still going to be $5 million in the hole as a starting point before a very expensive fitout.

Its not a terrible idea, but kickstarter isnt going to cut it for this one.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago

The image OP put in is from the Disney star wars hotel thing I think. If so OP is basically calling it overpriced shit and proposing a better experience. So yeah Fisney most certainly has the sway and cash for the cruise ship idea.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I don't think this would work as a tourist draw in the conventional sense. The problem is that money doesn't change hands enough times to generate enough secondary revenue and taxes, since everyone is "locked in" for the duration and the ticket sales happen online (or somewhere else). Typical hotels draw people to business and tourism all over the city, and this proposal is the opposite of that. Just like a typical cruise, this puts the cruise-liner in position to run their own tax free economy/experience for guests during their entire stay; just build everything into the ticket price.

Then you add the fact that an aging and immobile cruise ship is permanently occupying a deep-sea launch/slip in your harbor. That mooring point is no longer generating anywhere near as much income as before, since people are coming/going at a much more lax pace and you can't use it for freight. And moving the ship around to accommodate other boats is likely going to require tugs which is time consuming and probably a huge PITA for the harbor.

Now, if you could anchor it somewhere remote where none of that matters, then you'd have something.

I think it could work as a hotel instead. I think it would be cool to go on a "dry cruise," with all of the events and whatnot a cruise would have. I'd spend 2-3 days on one just exploring the ship and whatnot.