Technology

59605 readers

3302 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1414

The Verge shows how Google search is useless (www.theverge.com)

submitted 6 months ago by sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world

193 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Verge published this spam article about the "best printers of 2024" to demonstrate how terrible Google's search results are. It now appears as the top non-sponsored post if you search "best printer" on Google.

I love a good, informative troll.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world -15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But either way, what would that achieve?

Us being more acceptive of, and not belligerent to, AI written articles.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Nilay Patel - the editor in chief is anti-AI especially when it comes to article content. He doesn't allow anyone at the company to use generated content except when they are writing an article about AI and even then only to demonstrate a point - e.g. "here's a comparison of two LLMs with the same prompt". It was also his decision to stop AI's from crawling any content on their website.

He used AI to pad the article because that's what real spam articles do. It had nothing to do with acceptance.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

He used AI to pad the article because that’s what real spam articles do. It had nothing to do with acceptance.

That was a stated goal, yes, but if that sort of tactic is done again and again, at some point, people will push back less against AI in reviews. Toad in a slow boiling pot sort of thing.

Again, tongue-in-cheek. Don't overanalyze it, no need to defend, I'm just stating that was a possibility in the back of my mind, but not most likely what's really going on.

Relax, everything is fine. It's just conversation.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~