this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
5 points (64.7% liked)

Memes

45719 readers
1276 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FakinUpCountryDegen@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean... I'm a capitalist who doesn't defend billionaires and also doesn't feel left out... ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

[–] huge_clock@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right? There are pros and cons with every system. People disagree based on value judgements not based on misinterpretation of facts. People in their echo chambers will have you believe that everyone on the other side of the political spectrum all thinks the same way “the same people who say X also say Y!” Rarely is that the case. Most people are actually centrists who have their own independent beliefs on a wide range of topics.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not everyone on my side of the political Spectrum thinks the same way. But if you are pro capitalist. You simply aren't thinking. Capital, markets, and currency. All existed before capitalism. The only thing capitalism did was justify the wealth and power of the wealthy and Powerful Beyond being simply born to wealthy powerful people. Now you get to be a wealthy powerful person by having capital. Which ironically just so happens to be most common among people born too powerful people. New boss same as the old boss. Funny how that works.

[–] TAG@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hate capitalism, I just don't know of a better alternative. Nordic socialism is just capitalism with a big government. Soviet socialism failed miserably (it turns out, it is very hard to plan an economy). I have never heard a solid plan for communism that works on a national scale, never mind a plan for transitioning to such a society.

On the other hand, capitalism works reasonably well most of the time and we can just fix issues with it when they crop up (and we have a big backlog of issues to fix).

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Capitalism does not work reasonably well most the time. Unchecked it leads to countless busts and Booms that leave the average person destitute. You really should look into the history of the early 20th century. The only reason we even still have capitalism. Is because of two massive world wars. Slaughtering and grinding up many tens of millions of people. As well as passage of basic Social Security nets. We've largely at least abandoned the spirit of. If if not in practice as well.

Capitalism has been a failure at every level. Constantly. That isn't a justification or Praise of leninism. There's a lot of other ideologies on the Socialist side Beyond leninism. And they don't require large National level government. Look into them sometime.

[–] Flumsy@feddit.de -1 points 1 year ago

Is there any system that is more fair and/or gives you more freedom? I havent found any.

On a hypothetically completely free capitalist market, I can sell and buy whatever I wish and the value that I get when selling directly correlates to the value I'm bringing to the buyer. If I generated a lot of value, I have more capital so I can also buy more value using that capital. Sounds fantastic in theory.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Soviet socialism failed miserably (it turns out, it is very hard to plan an economy).

Did you actually check? Because based on a bunch of metrics I saw the USSR did pretty well compared to the feudalism that came before it and the capitalist "democracy" that came after its illegal and undemocratic dissolution.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you support capitalism, then yes, you defend billionaires.

[–] FakinUpCountryDegen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So, you support a system that inherently creates an upper class of obscenely rich people, yet are opposed to those people?

A system set up to enrich the owner of a business, while its workers lose out, creates exactly the people you claim not to defend.

[–] FakinUpCountryDegen@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, I'm not opposed to them... I just don't support them. They can support themselves, and I can support myself just fine. I make more money from them than I would without them, and they make money from me they wouldn't have otherwise had my skillset to access easily.

I've never been forced to take any job... I just manage my skillset in such a way that makes it both rare and valuable. I've worn many hats over the years, and I just play the game instead of bitching about the rules Worked out great for me and my family so far. I'll even have some to leave my kids so they don't have as hard of a time reaching even higher than I have. That's the whole point, for me: make my kids' life better than mine, and I've done that so far.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, I’m not opposed to them… I just don’t support them.

It doesn't work like that. They are in power, and by not opposing them, you consent to their continued power.

I make more money from them than I would without them,

That isn't even close to true. Capitalist extraction of surplus value is exactly how they make their profits. If they paid you the value you made them, they wouldn't have a profit. If they weren't there to extract that value, you and your fellow workers would make more - it's basic mathematics.

and they make money from me they wouldn’t have otherwise had my skillset to access easily.

This part is true, yes.

I’ve never been forced to take any job…

So, you're saying you're able to retire right now and never work again?

I just play the game instead of bitching about the rules

That's a slave mindset.

That’s the whole point, for me: make my kids’ life better than mine, and I’ve done that so far.

That's cool you can think that small and that selfishly. Others, however, realise you could be living even better, and everyone else, including those with nothing, could have that standard of living, too, if we stop being complacent with mere crumbs.

That's what you have. Mere crumbs of luxury. It's great that you're not on the street, but that is an incredibly low standard to have.

[–] Flumsy@feddit.de -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If that were the case (which it isnt) I dont see a problem defending billionaires (and on the side also everybody's freedom and justice)...

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can't defend billionaires and justice at the same time

[–] Flumsy@feddit.de -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why not? Capitalism is the most fair system to me.

[–] ThePenitentOne@discuss.online 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What is the metric for fairness here? And what version of 'capitalism' are we talking about?

[–] Flumsy@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fairness is subjective. To me it means: everyone is free to do what they like WITHOUT invading anybody elses freedom; if a person performs well, they should be rewarded well; everyone should have the same initial possibilities in life.

The version of capitalism I was talking about is capitalism with a regulated market. Basic needs should be covered (except if you refuse to contributr anything at all). Im pretty happy with the "social market economy" in Germany where I currently live.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

everyone is free to do what they like WITHOUT invading anybody elses freedom

But how am I gonna get someone to work for me without invading their freedom to choose to do what they want?

Hell no, man. No one will work at my shop if they're allowed to do what they want.

Basic needs should be covered (except if you refuse to contributr anything at all).

Fuck yeah man! That's how we do it! That's what gets people working for me - the threat that not doing so will put 'em on the street! That's what I'm talkin' about!

[–] Flumsy@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But how am I gonna get someone to work for me without invading their freedom to choose to do what they want?

By offering them something in return...? Money for example, from which one can buy nice things.

That's how we do it! That's what gets people working for me - the threat that not doing so will put 'em on the street!

Not contributing anything at all wont work in any system or sosciety. Or in what system can I lay in bed all day and get everything I need for free?

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By offering them something in return…? Money for example, from which one can buy nice things.

Who says I should do that? It's my prerogative to do what I can to make money. Don't try and regulate my ambition, you totalitarian communist.

Not contributing anything at all wont work in any system or sosciety. Or in what system can I lay in bed all day and get everything I need for free?

Absolutely nowhere, I say! Only people with gumption deserve to live!

[–] Flumsy@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can do what you like but you asked me how to get people working for you so I made a proposal.

Do you actually have a point or are you just being ridiculous because you have no arguments?

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I have plenty arguments. They were all written down for me by Adam Smith and improved by Milton Friedman.

[–] Flumsy@feddit.de -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whats your point? I explained why I find capitalism to be a fair system and further elaborated on what I concidered "fair". What are you trying to say or are you just trolling?

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I also agree it's fair. It fairly allows me to extract value from people as I sit back and do nothing. That's the pursuit of happiness in action, baby!

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It sounds like you basically just described retirement, and I see nothing wrong with that. I'm investing in my future so that someday my capital increases to the point that I can live off the proceeds. I absolutely don't want to work until I die.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

you basically just described retirement

Lmao no. I described ownership of private property. I described being able to own something, and get paid from people using it! The best scam in the world. Did you know you can just buy homes and get money from the people that wanted to buy it, yet not have to sell it to them? It's fucking marvellous - they live there, make it their home, and pay you for the privilege! And you get to be called a lord for doing this!