this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
871 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3223 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 148 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

Are we in a "free market" or we not? The answer is "depends on what lobbyists want."

[–] TheDubz87@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago

Free market goes to the highest bidder.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Free for me and not for thee.

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Might as well be the offical preamble of the Constitution (or at least the more conventional "rules for thee, not for me").

[–] rusticus@lemm.ee 14 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Lol without all the subsidies gas would be $12/gallon. And burning fossil fuels (40% is automotive) kills more than 250,000 Americans per year. Whats the cost of a human life brah?

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I think they're more commenting on how the supposedly "free market" champions constantly interfere with the market when it suits their agenda

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Exactly. Those people tend to be extreme hypocrites.

[–] rusticus@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah but in this case (EVs) it’s way better for public health and the “interference” is still a fraction of the scales tilted in fossil fuels favor.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Whats the cost of a human life brah?

That depends on if grandma is being evaluated by an Obama Death Panel (life is precious and invaluable) or by the stock market in 2020 (she has, what, a couple years left anyway, let her die).

[–] rusticus@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago

In the US there is only one metric: Dow Jones death panel. The insanity of our culture is that Obama Death Panels were an invention of the Dow Jones death panel board to rally the lemming brained right against the concept of public healthcare (the horror!). Oh yeah, obligatory fuck Joe Lieberman.

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes, that's the point. These politicians interfere and meddle and cry "free market" when it is convenient for them.

[–] rusticus@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago

Would have been far easier to just type “there is no free market”

[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Exactly I am not getting all this subsidy unfairness nonsense that stops Chinese firms from selling cars here. The only difference I'm seeing is that we're subsidizing cars on the back end through oil subsidies, and they are subsidizing cars on the front end with production subsidies.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Free market involves pluralism of systems and distribution of power as important preconditions. Lobbyism requires monoculture of systems and power being sufficiently centralized to be controllable.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Also, the free market is a tool, not a utopia. It optimizes for whatever the people setting the limits of it make it optimize for.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 months ago

Hence things I said. Otherwise the wheel is free for taking for the worst people.

[–] paf0@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

To play devil's advocate for a moment, is it really a free market if we are incentivizing one technology over another?

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 13 points 6 months ago

When the oil industry doesn't have to pay to clean up their externalities we already don't have a free market. You break it you pay. Fixing the externalities by incentivizing better technology is at minimum a correction to the market.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

That argument can be made about the tax incentives.

However, regulations about emissions are intrinsically something we want, and we shouldn't hold back on that just because gas cars can't get to the level of emissions we need.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Are we in a “free market” or we not?

Not.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@kbin.social 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Only when it helps to keep the poors in their place.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Not even only. The recognized goal of the modern marketplace is to achieve monopoly. Billionaires write entire textbooks on the subject.