Games

16796 readers

850 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

Gaming Industry Faces Peril Due to New Regulations – Are China’s Stricter Gaming Policies a Blueprint for Global Change? (thetechbasic.com)

submitted 11 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Horseshit. You are guided to value whatever worthless crap the game sells. If that's the only way a game makes money - funneling you toward that is the only reason the game exists. That is what all systems exist for, and that is what the full might of developers' manipulative rhetoric steers you toward.

All video games make you value arbitrary nonsense. That is what makes them games.

Every form of 'it's only X, it's not as bad as Y' is just willful ignorance toward how Y served the purpose of separating you from as much actual money as possible, and X has the exact same goal but a sharper razor.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Games cost money to develop. Unless a game is open-source, you either pay a fixed price initially, or have microtransactions. The problem is when they get greedy and do both / make it pay to win. Selling cosmetics does not affect gameplay, so I don't mind them doing it.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Again:

You are guided to value whatever worthless crap the game sells. If that’s even the primary way a game makes money - funneling you toward that is the only reason the game exists. That is what all systems exist for, and that is what the full might of developers’ manipulative rhetoric steers you toward.

And if it's that or buying games, gee, can you guess which one I endorse?

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Most players I know do not pay for cosmetics. 'Whales' - rich people who want to show off, or who love the game and want to support it - buy them. Some streamers also buy, but they get compensated by their sponsers. There is the occassional case of a kid buying it with their parent's money, and such purchases should definitely be reversed, but otherwise I see nothing wrong.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

There's also a good chance the so called 'whale' isn't actually that financially well off, and is being manipulated by the game into spending more than they can actually afford.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago

'It only rips off some people' is not a defense.

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

Path of Exile is a good example. F2P, quality game, shit ton of content, and not once did I feel tempted to buy cosmetics. I did buy additional stashes once, but that was a conscious choice to support the devs after playing for tens of hours.

[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works -1 points 10 months ago

Don't bother, this guy is just absolutely out of touch and unhinged when it comes to games.