this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
528 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59569 readers
4136 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
528
The New York Times source code leaked by a 4chan user (stackdiary.com)
submitted 5 months ago by skilledtothegills@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
83 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A user on the online forum 4chan has leaked a massive 270GB of data purportedly belonging to The New York Times. This leak includes what is claimed to be the source code for the newspaper’s digital operations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RagingHungryPanda@lemm.ee 178 points 5 months ago (4 children)

It's mostly node modules

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 120 points 5 months ago

"send nodes"

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I hate Web 3.0

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Node has been around longer than web3

NPM nightmares intensify

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Web 3.0 ≠ web3

[–] azl@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

As someone who has read these terms in passing but is unfamiliar with them: What the fuck?

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm with you. web3 is the cryptobro blockchain web, while Web 3.0 usually refers to either RFC-based standards or "the state of the modern web" - the post 2.0 era

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Http3 != web3.0

Web3 everywhere ive looked is strictly for blockchain approach to web

Im happy to be wrong, but my search yielded nothing to support your position. Do you have a resource handy?

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago

HTTP/3 is yet another thing, unrelated to both of them. Wikipedia has a disambiguation page for the two meanings: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_3.0 https://www.cnbc.com/2022/11/04/web-inventor-tim-berners-lee-wants-us-to-ignore-web3.html

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I also hate making things from smaller pieces, the engineering in software engineering. /s

[–] metaldream@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Nah fuck the entire node ecosystem. It’s proof of how bad people have become at software design. Especially web devs. It’s crazy to me how many devs introduce breaking changes because of their “philosophy” or because the original design was straight up terrible.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago (3 children)

270GB of mostly node modules?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 52 points 5 months ago

You're right, it would be bigger if it was node

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Sounds pretty average

[–] metaldream@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 months ago

Only 270GB? They must only have a few hundred lines of code.

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

pnpm store would probably save them a lot.of grief if true

[–] Doneee@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

Nah, having big node_modules folders is a security feature. It’s like keeping your valuables in a bag of trash.

It also takes a long time to make a dump, so you have a higher chance of noticing it happening.