this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2024
361 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

61381 readers
6616 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
361
Outcry from big AI firms over California AI “kill switch” bill (arstechnica.com)
submitted 8 months ago by photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
116 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yep nothing about censorship is cool. But for rampaging agi systems, a button to kill it would be nice. However it leads into a game and a paradox on how this could ever be achieved

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

I don't see much harm in a "kill switch", so If it makes people happy... But it is sci-fi silliness. AI is software. Malfunctioning software can be dangerous if it controls, say, heavy machinery. But we don't have kill switches for software. We have kill switches for heavy machinery, because that is what needs to be turned off to stop harm.