this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
421 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tigerjerusalem@lemmy.world 47 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Not good enough, it should have cancelled the feature altogether.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 47 points 5 months ago

The tech industry is so invested in "AI" at this point that if it admits defeat, the bubble will pop.

[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Even the cancellation is not good enough. The fact that this was even entertained shows how disconnected Microsoft is from the real world. If they can get this so wrong what else are they getting wrong.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's never really been a priority for them. Can you get something wrong that you weren't trying to get right in the first place?

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They did tell their employees to prioritize security above all else, right before not doing that.

[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So by implication they have not been telling their teams that since when, Windows95?

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

Yeah, that was basically my reaction, too. There was also some news that the CEO would now be taking responsibility for security, which had me similarly questioning what the hell they were doing so far.
Surely, the CEO is responsible for everything. So, did they just completely forget that security is also part of that?

[–] mojoaar@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Could not have said it better myself.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It’s hard to appreciate how much like catnip/crack AI is inside micro$oft.

They think they’re going to corner the market on AI before it ever actually does anything. No matter that 90% of people want absolutely nothing to do with it. As our de facto tech lords, they’ll tell us what we want. lol

[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But even if that is their semi-delusional master plan why scupper it by association with such a bad idea. There was not one person in all the hours of talk they must have spent on this that wondered if every device taking a screenshot every few minutes was a good idea. No matter the security it will be breached and this feature could be astoundingly destructive.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

That’s the crack effect. AI is a helluva drug. For every 10 developers and team leads who pointed out what a horrifying clusterfuck it would inevitably become, there were two senior directors or one VP who thought they could advance up the ladder by supporting it.

I don’t doubt that the majority of M$ employees are properly embarrassed about the whole thing. Not that that has ever mattered with regard to corporate direction.