Technology

59534 readers

3168 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

129

Let Readers Read | Internet Archive (blog.archive.org)

submitted 5 months ago by mesamunefire@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm mostly just parroting what others have said, I'm not a lawyer. But my understanding is that online book lending is supposed to be limited to a discrete number of lendees at a time, just like the books at a physical library. IA knew this and yet decided to remove restrictions so that more people could borrow books than they were allowed to lend out at once.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In the article it said they were lending to one user at a time though which seems reasonable. You are saying they didn't actually do this and that is the reason they are in hot water? So they are basically just denying that they did this?

[–] wagoner@infosec.pub 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I'd like to see evidence of what the original poster on this thread says before trusting what they are saying. I haven't seen this be the case at all.

"We purchase and acquire books—yes, physical, paper books—and make them available for one person at a time to check out and read online"

[–] Odo@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

The term you're looking for is National Emergency Library.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Again, mostly just parroting what I've seen others say, but my understanding is that they relaxed the restriction around when COVID started, though in the eyes of the law that's not really a good reason to break that particular rule.

I respect the scepticism though, definitely take everything I'm saying with a huge grain of salt.