Technology

59589 readers

2838 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

681

Google and Microsoft consume more power than some countries (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 4 months ago by lemmee_in@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

75 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In 2023, Google and Microsoft each consumed 24 TWh of electricity, surpassing the consumption of over 100 nations, including places like Iceland, Ghana, and Tunisia, according to an analysis by Michael Thomas. While massive energy usage means a substantial environmental impact for these tech giants, it should be noted that Google and Microsoft also generate more money than many countries. Furthermore, companies like Intel, Google, and Microsoft lead renewable energy adoption within the industry.

Detailed analysis reveals that Google's and Microsoft's electricity consumption — 24 TWh in 2023 — equals the power consumption of Azerbaijan (a nation of 10.14 million) and is higher than that of several other countries. For instance, Iceland, Ghana, the Dominican Republic, and Tunisia each consumed 19 TWh, while Jordan consumed 20 TWh. Of course, some countries consume more power than Google and Microsoft. For example, Slovakia, a country with 5.4 million inhabitants, consumes 26 TWh.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If your efficiency function is centered around revenue, then yeah, of course... No surprise that one of the world's most successful for-profit companies generates more profit per watt-hour than a nation, which encompasses all sorts of non-revenue-generating activity like running hospitals and keeping street lights on.

[–] tal@lemmy.today -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Those will be counted towards GDP -- that's all economic activity.

[–] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net -2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Lemmy is bad with money, economics and business, also anti corporate/work, so anything positive towards corporate tends to be slammed with ignorance. I try my best to just ignore those replies / votes and move on.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

I try to correct them if it's easy enough. I probably won't convince them, but maybe the next person will consider it and educate themselves.

[–] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

My comment isn't anti-corporate or anti-work though...? It just isn't that strange that Google is more efficient at generating revenue (as dollars-per-kWh) than Finland is.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 4 months ago

It's strange that people believe capitalist/political metrics mean anything of value.