this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
356 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
3438 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mke@lemmy.world 161 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

All the more reason to use Firefox with uBlock Origin if you can, which despite concerns regarding Mozilla are still much more likely to align with users' best interests and help you avoid being tracked all over the web.

Instead of deprecating third-party cookies, we would introduce a new experience in Chrome that lets people make an informed choice that applies across their web browsing, and they’d be able to adjust that choice at any time.

What does this even mean, Google?

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 90 points 4 months ago (2 children)

What does this even mean?

There's an opt-out check box buried 4 clicks deep in Chrome settings. The choices are "Allow 3rd party Cookies" and "Ask me later".

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It should reset every time the browser is closed and/or daily to respect the, uh, dynamics of the modern consumer.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

"You may not want it now, but you'll want it tomorrow. We'll help you make this decision for you."

[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

“Informed”

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 57 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Means they'd like to replace cookies with something proprietary that they control.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

they're trying, with that 'privacy' sandbox crap.

[–] coolmojo@lemmy.world -4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And sadly Mozilla is doing the same with the Privacy-Preserving Attribution.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago

not even remotely the same thing

[–] sfxrlz@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Enshittification is a pattern where online services and products experience a decline in quality over time. It is observed as platforms transition through several stages: initially offering high-quality services to attract users, then shifting to favor business customers to increase profitability, and finally focusing on maximizing profits for shareholders at the expense of both users and business customers. #

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

despite their issues

What issues?

[–] mke@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Edited to clarify which one I was referring to.

The definition of issue here changes significantly from person to person, from some disliking Firefox's visual design to others criticizing business and technical decisions by Mozilla.

Honestly, there's nothing I feel like bringing up and starting another discussion over. I mostly added that to stop certain folks from cleverly answering "but what about ? Mozilla isn't a saint!" As though that wasn't taken into account from the start.