Technology

59589 readers

2936 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[Gamers Nexus] Intel Needs to Say Something: Oxidation Claims, New Microcode, & Benchmark Challenges (www.youtube.com)

submitted 4 months ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/14490289

Steve from Gamers Nexus explicitly states that they "can't recommend Intel CPUs right now" until Intel provides information and assurance to customers

Intel what are you doing? Shit's on fire, yo

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Hey, look who it is, the person who keeps replying without linking the mountains of data they're referencing.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Look who it is, the person that thinks there's a global conspiracy to make less money, solely in to put faces everywhere despite people supposedly hating it.

[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Bruh I just want you to supply the data you claim to be citing. It's super easy and standard practice. It is not my job to research the point I think you are making.

Or, you could simply say you don't have data to back up what you said. Either works and neither is as embarrassing as coming back to this well over and over while entirely missing that I just want to see your data.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

You can find it by using a search engine of your choice. But here's a snippet from one I found in like 5 seconds:

In the SEO company's analysis, they took a look at some of the most viewed videos on YouTube currently and found some similarities between them within their categories. The company sourced YouTube API data in July to conduct the study and analyze the most popular content on the site.

On average, thumbnails that feature stills from the video or images get 1.7 million views, compared to thumbnails with animation, which average 1.4 million views. Seventy-two percent of the most popular thumbnails include a face and get 921,000 more views, on average, than thumbnails without faces.

Believe it or not, YouTube thumbnails have faces because humans like faces. As I stated. It's not some global anti-capitalist cabal conspiring to earn less profit by purposely crafting thumbnails that people don't like.

People are drawn to faces. This is an established scientific fact that I laid out in my very first comment. You aren't special. It applies to you too.

Now, do you have any data on people disliking seeing faces in media?

[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You're so close, now just give me a link to the data that you are citing.

And then it will still be an annoying, stupid way to advertise.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Except it's not, because it works, as I have already pointed out.

Are you stupid? It gets more people watching the video, and maintains engagement throughout the video when they see faces. If you think successfully getting people to watch your videos is "stupid", then you're clearly a bit clueless.

[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

I'd be careful asking people if they're stupid and speculating that they're clueless when you are apparently unwilling to producing a link to the data you quote.