this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
404 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

71989 readers
3391 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
404
Musk's X sues advertisers over alleged 'massive advertiser boycott'. (www.voanews.com)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world
67 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Archive.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This requires proof for collusion, does it not?

[โ€“] Vanth@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago

I would think. And if that proof exists, it will come up at the appropriate time during legal proceedings. I'm skeptical there is any.

I guess they could call the entire existence of GARM to be collusion; companies banding together to "punish" companies who don't follow their guidelines. But X is (was?) a voluntary member of GARM, so it seems that would be a difficult argument for them to make without implicating themselves too.