this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
378 points (98.2% liked)
Technology
59534 readers
3196 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Any evidence to that effect, or is this just doomerism?
It's called healthy skepticism and it saves lives. By preparing for all worst case outcomes we can help prevent them all.
Skepticism is healthy when you're actually making a decision and you decide you need more information.
Are you actually making any preparations or are you just throwing out cynical assertions based on bad vibes?
If I had to make a decisions in this exact circumstance I sure as fuck wouldn't write Natron a blank check for the state treasury. Yeah, I'm saying I want more information before I endorse this.
So doomerism it is then...
Immediately assuming that every potentially good thing that happens is actually fraud, without evidence, is just paranoia.
Saying that it is a fraud publicly, without evidence, is just disinformation.
Believing things without evidence isn't "healthy skepticism", it's just credulity. Don't be a rube.