this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
109 points (98.2% liked)

Games

16796 readers
850 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's fine. Nintendo would probably sue them for copyright something or other anyway. Like they do to everyone everywhere.

[–] zfirerose@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (3 children)

What does that even mean...? Sue them for an award?

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They sued people for competing in a competitive game they made, so they're not above it.

[–] limitedduck@awful.systems 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is this true? What's the story here?

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Super Smash Bros. has a long history of contention with Nintendo.

[–] limitedduck@awful.systems 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Enough for something to actually end up in court? Because that's pretty specific

[–] Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Nintendo shuts down Smash World Tour ‘without any warning’

Said tournament was going to have the largest ever prize pool of $250,000.

Given the company’s aggressive copyright enforcement, this isn’t the first time that Nintendo has forced grassroots competitions using its games to stop operating, having similarly shut down a Super Smash Bros. tournament in 2020. Nintendo also notably ordered Evo — the world’s largest fighting game tournament — to shut down a planned Melee event in 2013 before reversing the decision.

The Smash World Tour said it will lose hundreds of thousands of dollars as a result of the shutdown but reassures all attendees of the canceled events that they will be issued full refunds.

[–] limitedduck@awful.systems 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not a lawsuit, but I agree that's pretty nasty

[–] Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 months ago

Presumably if they didn't comply it would have been a lawsuit

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

More like waving around legal orders against people who comply because they can't afford to challenge them in court. For this and other reasons, fuck Nintendo.

[–] zfirerose@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I know but the joke doesn't make sense in that context. They would not be using their property; they would recognize them for it.

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

I would be unsurprised if Nintendo tried to sue a Patent Office for looking at Nintendos name on their own damn patent submission.

At this point they'd probably sue their employees for uttering character names outside of work.

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't need to make sense. It just needs to paint companies in a bad light.

[–] zfirerose@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean whatever, if you hate Nintendo that's one thing but the joke is such a stretch, lol

It's not a matter of whether you hate them or not

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

You seem to have misunderstood what I said. I was being sarcastic, taking the role of the person making the joke.