this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
28 points (72.6% liked)

Technology

73297 readers
3715 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
28
Everyone assumes it's game over, but Intel's huge bet on 18A is still very much game on (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 10 months ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Admittedly, Intel is running out of margin. Whatever the real reason for the 20A cancellation, there is very little time left to prove that 18A is everything Intel claims. And yet the prize for Intel if it can deliver with 18A is monumental.

Simply because we've done the whole "single point of failure" before when it comes to markets, I hope they succeed, so we don't have a repeat of the chip shortage in 2020. Giant companies suck, but we'd all feel that one if TSMC was the only player and got swept up into a military pissing contest between China and the US.

[–] Peffse@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm guessing that Intel's contingency plan includes a US government bailout if they fail.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago

Of course it does. Why wouldn't it? If I were an unscrupulous major shareholder of Intel looking for profit maximization above all else, I'd assume a bailout in the cards. Stop squeaking and give me another stock buyback. We gotta pump this bitch as far as it'll go before it hits the wall.