this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
322 points (95.2% liked)

Not The Onion

17135 readers
3022 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MuAraeOracle@real.lemmy.fan 57 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Finger guns are not covered under the 2nd amendment.

[–] yggstyle@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Well you see your honor: the hand is connected to the arm.... And we have the right to bear arms so...

[–] blackluster117@possumpat.io 10 points 10 months ago

Ah, the RFK Jr defense. Nice.

[–] fossphi@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Then ask your bear to make a finger gun

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago

I prefer to have the right to Bear Arms, tbh.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

The arms are a right, the hands at the end of them are a privilege...

[–] ianonavy@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

It’s the right to bear arms, not the right to bare arms!

Yes it does, finger guns 100% existed in the 18th century

[–] fractal_flowers@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

But they should be covered under the 1st amendment. The problem is that children don't have many rights in the US.