this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
187 points (88.2% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3135 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

For OpenAI, o1 represents a step toward its broader goal of human-like artificial intelligence. More practically, it does a better job at writing code and solving multistep problems than previous models. But it’s also more expensive and slower to use than GPT-4o. OpenAI is calling this release of o1 a “preview” to emphasize how nascent it is.

The training behind o1 is fundamentally different from its predecessors, OpenAI’s research lead, Jerry Tworek, tells me, though the company is being vague about the exact details. He says o1 “has been trained using a completely new optimization algorithm and a new training dataset specifically tailored for it.”

OpenAI taught previous GPT models to mimic patterns from its training data. With o1, it trained the model to solve problems on its own using a technique known as reinforcement learning, which teaches the system through rewards and penalties. It then uses a “chain of thought” to process queries, similarly to how humans process problems by going through them step-by-step.

At the same time, o1 is not as capable as GPT-4o in a lot of areas. It doesn’t do as well on factual knowledge about the world. It also doesn’t have the ability to browse the web or process files and images. Still, the company believes it represents a brand-new class of capabilities. It was named o1 to indicate “resetting the counter back to 1.”

I think this is the most important part (emphasis mine):

As a result of this new training methodology, OpenAI says the model should be more accurate. “We have noticed that this model hallucinates less,” Tworek says. But the problem still persists. “We can’t say we solved hallucinations.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] geography082@lemm.ee 22 points 2 months ago (4 children)

How much more time until they use the word “sentient”?

[–] RelativeArea0@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

Until the bubble bursts

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

Is that even the goal? Do we want an AI that's self aware because I thought that basically the whole point was to have an intelligence without a mind.

We don't really want sapient AI because if we do that then we have to feel bad about putting it in robots and making them do boring jobs. Don't we basically want guildless servants, isn't that the point?

[–] geography082@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

Yeah I was thinking more about it as marketing, than a real thing

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

For the servants bots, yes no sentience. For my in house AI assistant robot buddy/butler/nanny/driver - also yes no sentience.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What we want doesn't have any impact on what our corporate overlords decide to inflict on us.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago

They don't want sapient AI either, why would they?

No one is trying for a self-aware artificial intelligence.

[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 months ago

It seems utopia/dystopia, but some things get discovered/invented by accident. The more companies and organizations (and even individuals) fiddle with AI improvement, the more the "odds" of a sentient AI (AGI) being accidentally created increases. Let's not forget that there are lots of companies, organizations and individuals (yeah, individuals, people outside organizations but with lots of computing power and knowledge) simultaneously developing and training AIs. Well, maybe I'm wrong and just very optimistic for such thing to appear out of nowhere.

[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’m more concerned about them using the word “sapient.” My dog is sentient; it’s not a high bar to clear.

[–] geography082@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

The meaning is ok. But “sentient” is so hot right now

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 months ago

Not until it has senses, which it currently does not have.