this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
602 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59963 readers
3505 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Surprised pikachu face

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 71 points 3 months ago (20 children)

Hey, remember when you guys lined up to suck his dick when the board tried to keep OpenAI working for the good of humanity instead of the oligarchy?

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I hate being right

Why do people keep being fooled by rich assholes

[–] s3p5r@lemm.ee 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)

People have grown up reading comic books and watching movies about generous billionaire superhero saviors. They want to believe that exists because it's what they've been taught justice looks like.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Surprising, since Lex Luthor was often portrayed as a wealthy billionaire.

[–] s3p5r@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I feel like Luthor was a better counterexample for this before the model for his billionaire redesign was elected President of the USA.

Even so, Luthor hasn't had quite the same volume of appearances as Iron Man, Batman, Captain America and the other rich superhero tropes.

[–] Big_Boss_77@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 3 months ago

I'm not super hip on comics... but Grandpa Popsicle was rich?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And yet the problem was never that he was a billionaire, and Lexcorp was never portrayed as anything but an industrial powerhouse whose existence was ultimately good.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Lexcorp was never portrayed as anything but an industrial powerhouse whose existence was ultimately good.

The largest international arms dealing firm that did Captain Planet Villain tier pollution, corruption, and financial scams was "ultimately good"?

Didn't Lexcorp literally clone an army of Doomsdays?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Obviously it's going to be the "villain" as Lex's plaything but it's also on that "job creator" cope.

https://dc.fandom.com/wiki/LexCorp

Employs literally 2/3 of Metropolis's population lol. Lex even handed it over Superman at one point and made him the CEO because he was on a "Earth needs Superman" arc while obviously CEOs are the real heroes and such, and what are you going to do, Superman? Unemploy a supermajority of Metropolis? It NEEDS Lexcorp, etc etc.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

"How will we get by without all our financialized monopolies?!"

Idk, bro. Just keep doing what you're doing, minus the extraordinary rents to your bloated bourgeois landlords, maybe?

[–] Odd_so_Star_so_Odd@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They do exist they just prefer to be anonymous in their altruism so nobody hears about them.

[–] s3p5r@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How convenient that a counterexample can't be named

[–] morriscox@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Actually, this is part of Jewish society. Essentially, one is not supposed to do it for glory. I suspect that part of that is to avoid getting letters pleading for more money from those who they have helped or who knows that they helped someone. A lot of charities share/sell donor lists.

load more comments (18 replies)