this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
302 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cjf@feddit.uk 75 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • App Store for iPhone
  • App Store for iPad
  • App Store for Apple Watch
  • App Store for Mac
  • App Store for Apple TV

I guess if this gets argued correctly it means Apple could technically get away with not opening up the iPad, Apple TV and Apple Watch to accept other stores (Mac already lets you install apps directly from developers). I can see this still letting Apple continue to have the stranglehold over their ecosystem.

I doubt this will change much though. We all know the EU were specifically thinking about the iPhone which needs opening up.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 90 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Mac already lets you install apps directly from developers

I just find this language interesting. How a computer now "lets" you install non-walled garden software, as if that hasn't been the default behavior for personal computers for over 40 years since the beginning.

[–] cjf@feddit.uk 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I get what you’re saying and I hate that I had to write it like that. Was saying it to point out that Mac’s just aren’t as locked down as other Apple devices so won’t be subject to the EU ruling anyway.

The entire argument is stupid anyway.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They do limit you without a certain (hidden) key press if the developer isn't on a trusted list.

[–] Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

AFAIK it uses certificates for that, kinda like a more aggressive form of Windows' User Account Control.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But I thought that the whole thing about the mac was that it wasn't a personal computer (pc)?

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What, does it still belong to Apple after you buy it? Lol

[–] Auzymundius@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think he might be referencing those "I'm a Mac. And I'm a PC" commercials

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Which were stupid for their phrasing, but marketing genius, lol

Some people literally believe that a Mac cannot be called a PC.

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

"well ackshullyyyyyy..."

- Apple lawyer