this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
195 points (89.2% liked)

Technology

59495 readers
3135 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Intriguingly, as the date for the airing of the documentary has drawn near, a number of high-value wallets from the "Satoshi era" have become active for the first time since 2009.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 114 points 1 month ago (4 children)

extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 67 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Not really, all it requires is someone to produce a signed message with one of Satoshi's private keys, which can be easily verified with the public addresses on the blockchain. Whoever produced that message can be proven to possess that private key. Nothing short of that would be believable by the crypto nerds.

If we presume that Satoshi understood that Bitcoin may be valuable one day and kept the keys private, that would mean that the signer really is Satoshi, or one of his associates or heirs Satoshi trusted wih access. Even if that person wasn't actually Satoshi, their word on who it is would be considered authoritative.

Unless it's Craig. Fuck that guy. Nobody believes him.

[–] jungle@lemmy.world 67 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That is the extraordinary evidence being referenced.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ordinary claims require ordinary evidence, then?

[–] jungle@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, because it's an extraordinary claim.

[–] thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

"Extraordinary" means outside the realm of ordinary. Signing a message is very ordinary

EDIT: Sorry I ment to say: saying "I own a key" is ordinary, and signing a message is the ordinary way to prove you own the key

[–] suigenerix@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Sure, anyone can sign with a key. Having THE key is the extraordinary part.

[–] jungle@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Saying you know who Satoshi is, that's the claim, and that's an extraordinary claim.

[–] neidu2@feddit.nl 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"With great claims come great responsibility"

That guy from Spiderman, probably

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] neidu2@feddit.nl 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, that's the guy, I think.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I hate how this phrase has been abused so much. There's nothing particularly extraordinary here--we're not talking about bigfoot or aliens--and the whole point of a documentary like this is to lay out evidence.

[–] Baaahb@feddit.nl 3 points 1 month ago

Ordinary claims!

[–] snowsuit2654@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

Most people do not know who Satoshi is.