dhork

joined 2 years ago
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago

I'm less upset that all SSNs might end up compromised and more upset that no one is going to get punished for it. If a career Federal Employee did this, they would be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

But since it was Elon's friends who did it, everyone in power will just shrug and say "who knew this would be such a big deal"....

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Voting Blue? No Vote For You!

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago

If you can afford a BMW in the first place, you can afford the blinker fluid subscription....

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 85 points 3 days ago (4 children)

If BMW truly wants to innovate, they should work on fixing their turn signals. They must always be in a state of disrepair, because I rarely see a BMW driver use them....

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Thank you, I try

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Hey, it's a Drew Magary sighting! Glad to see he is not just sticking to sports....

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

Um Ackshually, they proclaimed Feb 6 as Ronald Reagan day because that was his birthday, and he used to be Governor of California, so there's at least a connection there. Thatcher's day would probably be October 13th.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

That company's name? Plock. No, it's not just Flock with a Sharpie mark over the "F", trust us!

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Bad Bunny just sitting over there, thinking «Ahora soy como Elvis»....

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Legally, they can't be sure you didn't sell the account, even if the email address is the same.

Not defending the policy here, it's bullshit. But I'm simply pointing out that they have excuses to beat any logic you throw at them. Logic has nothing to do with it, so it can't be beaten by logic either.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (18 children)

I've seen whistles with the number for the local rapid response hotline printed right on them. Must have been one of those fancy multi-filament printers.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It's not totally out of the realm of possibility. Michael Dell did it, after all, but he did it in a different time.

And Dell is actually a good case study for all this. It went public rather quickly after it started growing, but grew a bit stagnant by the 2000's. So much so that 2013, Michael Dell orchestrated a leveraged buyout of his own company (with the help of venture capital) to make it private again. He pretty much admitted that the changes he wanted to make to the company would be impossible while it was still public. It stayed private for a while, but went public again as part of some deal made after it acquired the parent company of VMware.

Another notable thing is that Carl Ichan owned a large chunk of Dell, both in its first public incarnation and in its private incarnation. When Dell tried to take it private, Ichan challenged the plan, and thought about putting in his own bid, only to back off when he decided it wasn't worth the effort to revive the company. Still, he was publicly against Dell's buyout plan but was outvoted by other shareholders. Yet, he must have still held a part of the private company, because Ichan also protested it's second plan to go public, and sued to force Dell to increase its terms to the private holders.

Michael Dell is no saint, but I conclude that he realized that the company meant more than a spreadsheet, and needed a purpose to justify its existence. He also realized that in order to sustain a business over the long term, having to constantly sustain quarterly numbers may be counterproductive. I think Carl Ichan, on the other hand, only cares about Number Go Up, and doesn't care at all about how the company makes that happen. Over the long term, that will never be sustainable, but fuck you all, he got his bag already.

view more: next ›