dhork

joined 2 years ago
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Apparently, all it takes to offer a nomination is to write a letter to the committee. But the committee says they only accept nominations from people who meet their criteria

https://www.nobelpeaceprize.org/nobel-peace-prize/nomination/criteria-for-nominators

"Journalists" are not in that list. But as a former prize winner himself, if Obama were to forward the letter along and say he endorses it, that might be enough to get it over the line.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 57 points 2 days ago (17 children)

Next we'll hear that Jeffrey Epstein was personally responsible for the Fyre Festival

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

"I was given that RV honestly!'

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Presidents are generally immune from lawsuits because we don't want them being distracted by them, yet this guy can sue whoever he wants?

NYT times should countersue. Why not? We'll see if they can use the ancient legal theory of "He started it!"

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 90 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Doubtful. Embarassment requires feeling shame, and neither the givers nor the recipient of the FIFA "Peace Prize" are capable of that.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Sydney Water’s deepwater ocean outfalls (DOOF) assessment report, dated 30 August 2025, was produced for the New South Wales Environment Protection Authority, which has been investigating the “debris balls” that closed numerous beaches in late 2024 and early 2025.

doof

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Seems to me like the head of a global media conglomerate should be more aware of the messages he sends. If he were an employee, this would probably have gotten him fired. But ownership is the best job security, isn't it?

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

You can't tell me what to do

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

This is, at least, trying to solve an actual problem. It remains to be seen whether the solution is more cost effective (and durable) as bifocals. As a human of a certain age myself, I would welcome being able to see without having to tilt my head awkwardly.

But something tells me this tech is not self-contained, and requires an always-on connection to some cloud resource which is guzzling electricity and water. No thanks! Bifocals are cheaper.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

For a C64 emulator, sure, but we can do better now.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Yes, this would be awesome, but for the love of all that is holy can it please not be BASIC?

view more: next ›