this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
673 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

59495 readers
3081 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

https://time.com/12854/microsoft-to-take-windows-xp-off-life-support-despite-its-29-market-share/

XP was a whopping 29% at EOL which is impressive to me that 7 is only 3%. But it makes sense that 10 has such a large market share since it was free and ran on (almost) everything that ran 7.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think a large part of it is how most of the machines that could run 7 can run everything after 7 (maybe just need more RAM), but many many MANY machines running XP couldn’t move forward because the CPU or the integrated graphics just couldn’t take it.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My hard drive couldn't take all the background shit in 10, it would literally stutter scanning my files. When I tried to disable the anti-virus and it told me "I'm sorry, Dave. I’m afraid I can’t do that"

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m not trying to judge, but you installed and ran a modern operating system on a spinning platter drive?

I had to switch to SSDs in 2016 because macOS was dragging hard on a Pro notebook.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

My old laptop doesn't have an M.2 slot

It ran fast enough in windows 8 and linux. It only became unbearable on windows 10

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And XP was 32 bit only, it was really an updated version of Win2k, which was really rock solid.

Which kind of supports your point.

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago

XP did have a 64-bit version, but at the time 64-bit wasn't widely used.

this is full EOL not like normal user EOL, normal user EOL ended in 2020.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wish I could upvote you for your username! Haha

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's nothing stopping you.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I already upvoted for the comment, I'm out of upvotes!

[–] superkret@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

I upvoted them for you.