Technology

59495 readers

3081 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

944

Inside the U.S. Government-Bought Tool That Can Track Phones at Abortion Clinics (www.404media.co)

submitted 4 weeks ago by otter@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world

248 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Privacy advocates got access to Locate X, a phone tracking tool which multiple U.S. agencies have bought access to, and showed me and other journalists exactly what it was capable of. Tracking a phone from one state to another to an abortion clinic. Multiple places of worship. A school. Following a likely juror to a residence. And all of this tracking is possible without a warrant, and instead just a few clicks of a mouse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 43 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

How is this not a warrantless search?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 29 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It is, but the USA hasn't cared since Snowden.

[–] Cock_Inspecting_Asexual@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

UNDERTALE???!?!?!??11

[–] Negligent_Embassy@links.hackliberty.org 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That's the issue with the patriot act, they've been allowed to do warrantless searches for a long time now.

FISA court if they run into any friction

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Because a carrier's data on you is not your person or belongings. The companies holding this data are selling access to it, so it's not being searched, it's being offered.

In other words, the same reason as why they don't need a search warrant if there's a breaking and the business across the street volunteers their security camera footage, even if you're on that footage.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Courts have actually said that looking back at someone's location data counts as a search and requires a warrant. There's currently a lawsuit recently filed by the institute for justice aledging that the use of flock safety license plate readers is unconstitutional because it's a warrantless search.