this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
-49 points (25.7% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
3376 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Sure, it runs Android. What did people expect? They aren't going to build a custom system from scratch.

The appeal is the form factor

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zarxrax@lemmy.world 35 points 6 months ago (3 children)

What amazes me is how many people care about this piece of crap in the first place. Like WHY is everyone talking about it? It could have been one of thousands of shitty tech products that I had never even heard of, but everyone wants to talk about it for some reason.

[–] ThrowawaySobriquet@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Probably getting paid to spread sentiment, but the guys writing their checks really only know the steps to marketing a product while forgetting that the product also has to be, ya know, good. Typical MBA shit: put out a new thing that does an old thing in a new, walled garden sort of way then go absolutely HAM on pushing all the units before the influencers that still have souls start bashing it

[–] shellsharks@infosec.pub 3 points 6 months ago

AI brainworm

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 33 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

They claim they made a custom os, so its totally reasonable to assume they are going to build a custom system from scratch

https://www.rabbit.tech/rabbit-os

They make no mention of AOSP

And finally, the whole thing is just an app and the device is entirely pointless

edit. and after watching someone use it - whats the point?! Its just a phone with a much worse interface, a terrible form factor, and it doesn’t even function.

Is OP the rabbit CEO or something

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Oh ffs, what a shitty, juvenile website. All lowercase, no real explanation of what it does, other than track users by having everything go through their servers.

Sounds like a scam to me.

And push to talk? Who uses that anymore? Welcome to 2000.

[–] PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

At least the stuff I've seen is more a criticism of the lack of functionality for the Rabbit, esspecially unique functionality or areas where it excels. The fact that it is basically all able to be contained in one app is viewed as evidence of the relative simplicity, and the fact that (as reviews highlighted) a phone provides a better interaction method compared to the dedicated devices just highlights how unnecessary the hardware is.

Basically, its competing against phones in functionality, but a phone at that price can do everything it can and better, plus so much more. Even worse when considering everyone also already owns a phone and won't be able to replace with a Rabbit.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

Also a little bit with it being advertised as "not an app", when it turns out to be an app, and doesn't have any special magic that makes it need that dedicated hardware.

[–] best_username_ever@sh.itjust.works 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What will you do when the company shuts down and it becomes a $200 brick?

[–] knightly@pawb.social 15 points 6 months ago

Yes.

They expected companies not to make badly-designed not-phones that depend entirely on internet services, most of which will undoubtedly be shuttered by the end of the year.

[–] lemmyworld2023@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Looks like a toy, functions as one too

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 months ago

That's not a bad thing in my head

[–] EmilyIsTrans@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 months ago

I think the Rabbit R1 is an underbaked and dumb product. That said, Rabbit would have had to have had a few too many kicks to the head if they seriously considered not just running Android under the hood. Android is open source, and there is no good reason to not utilize the hundreds of millions of dollars that Google has already poured into developing mature a mature operating system with all the drivers and frameworks they need.

[–] isgleas@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago

This seems to be the juicero for the AI

[–] boolean@kbin.social 6 points 6 months ago

yes. Enjoy your garbage.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 5 points 6 months ago

The appeal is the form factor

Looks like a red playdate.

Difference is, playdate is a fun toy, and that looks completely useless.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Looks like it, yup.

[–] tigerjerusalem@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

There is NO appeal for this product. We already carry an AI device, it's called a smartphone. We already have an AI device on our bodies, it's called a smartwatch. This thing solves no problem and creates a lot of new ones, like being an annoying tamagotchi that doesn't even bring the pleasure to use it. It's a scam to pocket VC money.

[–] Lutra@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You are not the only one.

This weeks game of 'Internet pile-on'

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I though this would be an honest discussion. Instead, I got down voted for not agreeing with the public narrative

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 1 points 6 months ago

I don't see any discussion below my honest opinion.

I do see a downvote though, whoever disagreed with me apparently preferred that to discussion too.

[–] tigerjerusalem@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's not a "public narrative" when the product is objectively trash. You don't get to have an opinion about a fact like "don't eat plutonium because you will die" and say "oh, I don't think so, it's your narrative".

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

200usd is 10 months of chatgpt subscription. So it definitely has objective value. I'd buy it just make my own little bot or as casual toy. There's no subscription or anything either.

I agree that the hate is meme levels of stupid. Sure the device sucks but people pick on the weirdest shit like "it uses android" or "it runs VM for actions that have no API" - well duuuuh.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

I think it would be cool if they completely opened everything up. I want to tie this device into a self hosted LLM

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But it's like the free ChatGPT quality

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

You cant automate free chatgpt but you can easily automate rabbit's api