this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
130 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

72795 readers
3098 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 83 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Ars reported in February that Blue Origin, which is owned by Jeff Bezos, is the leading candidate to buy United Launch Alliance.

I’m so sick of billionaires and their space shit.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The privatizing of everything will continue, now get back to your wage.

[–] decerian@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

ULA is already a private company. I don't think the US government has done any of their own work to get to space since the shuttle.

[–] ricdeh@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Bimfred@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The SLS is arguable, I'd say. The design requirements were set by the government, but it's not built by NASA. It's built by Aerojet Rocketdyne, Northrop Grumman, Boeing and ULA, all of which are private companies. I don't think NASA has ever built a rocket, actual construction has always been contracted out to private companies. Even the first Atlas was repurposed from an ICBM built by Convair and General Dynamics.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 6 points 1 year ago

And even if SLS is an example of non-private rocketry, it's hardly something that should be touted as a positive example. Especially not when launch pace is your criterion.

[–] yogurt@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

The Space Shuttle was also a private company. United Space Alliance LLC owned the Space Shuttles, United Launch Alliance LLC owns the military rockets, Deep Space Transport LLC owns the SLS rocket.

"Privatized" space just means instead of the government hiring Boeing or Lockheed to design a rocket according to their requirements, picking contractors to build it, and creating an LLC owned by all the contractors to pay them, Jeff Bezos hires ex-Boeing and Lockheed employees to build a rocket to his requirements, and then sues the government until they agree to pay him to launch it.

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bah, like the Romulans could do any better.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Imagine their faces when they'll tell em it's a work of fiction..

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 year ago

Damn, wonder why ULA is up for sale. Boeing and Lockheed don't want to play together anymore?