this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54716 readers
269 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Quote from the article: “The inclusion of intrusive DRM softwares [sic] like Denuvo is a choice that yields an unfair punishment on the consumer,” Running With Scissors says. “Respect the consumer, make a game they want to play, and you will never feel the need to fight piracy. The gaming industry deserves a better future, fight for that.”

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Abolish intellectual property (and private property in general)

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There was a big high wall there that tried to stop me.

The sign was painted, said ‘Private Property.’

But on the backside, it didn’t say nothing.

This land was made for you and me.

[–] privadesco@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Denuvo is the apex of a long history of bad choices.

Maybe actually sell us the games in a way we really own it, without any sort of online activation/account/telemetry/data-gathering like when we could buy a disc and just use it, and it should all be ok.

I feel like a dinosaur every-time I think this nowadays, but what is so problematic with the "own as in physically own" that is so hard to implement? If they want to provide a service, sell a service.

In the past I used pirate versions of games I bought just to be able to play them offline, or because I did not agree with the terms of service. It is so much for our info, it goes beyond just knowing you are the real owner of the software copy: it comes to the point where it looks like it's to guarantee we are not its' owner.

Now some DRMs even destroy gaming performance and its just faster to use 'ked versions. I hope it changes somehow.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Crackers: We don't do it for the piracy, we just like the challenge.

Denuvo: Try this one then.

Crackers: Too hard bro, at least give us a chance!

I acknowledge that this isn't going to be a popular opinion in a piracy sub, but the main reason people hate Denuvo is that it works.

It's basically killed the entire game hacking scene, because by the time they break it, nobody is interested in the game any more. There's like one person left that can do it, and they're more than a little bit odd.

It may be "anti-consumer", but you know what was worse? All the other shit they tried on PC. Always online bullshit. Single player games that you couldn't save any more if your connection wobbled. Actual rootkits.

[–] space_comrade@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Death to the concept of intellectual property and all but I've never actually felt Denuvo making problems for me when I played a game using it, you're right it seems to be working as advertised.

I'm still hoping someone to crack it in a more reliable and fast manner, fuck large gamedev companies and their profit margins.

[–] ne0phyte@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People hate Denuvo because it requires a regular connection to the Internet and has a big impact on the performance of games.

I'm not buying these games not because I can't pirate games with Denuvo (I don't really pirate games at all anymore) but because they tend to run like shit.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 1 points 1 year ago

I pirate because the original runs like shit.

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Running With Scissors is a "legendary" developer?

Postal was a violent mess that didn't age well.

Postal 2 was a buggy mess that also didn't age well.

After that, it was just legitimately bad games on top of the humor not aging well. (They literally don't even acknowledge Postal 3)

Seriously, who the fuck would label them legendary? They've been a broken mess for over a decade.

[–] doublepepperoni@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

The Titanic is a legendary ship, but it wasn't a very good ship

[–] 000999@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

All this serves to prove is that you have fucking god awful taste

[–] Zorque@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

People who agree with their stance on DRM.

Theres a definite trend of people elevating the value of opinions of those they agree with. It makes any kind of intelligent discourse very hard to do.

[–] boog@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do I need to repeat the Gabe Newell line again?

[–] Never_Sm1le@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have always wanted to be a giant space crab?

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Postal" is such a steaming pile of edgelord shit that even Civvie11 doing videos on the franchise doesn't make it any more bearable for me.

Critical support for this developer's message here, that said.

[–] axont@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I appreciate Postal 2 because the premise is kinda funny. It's deliberately designed so you can beat it without doing any violence at all. You're given tasks like get milk, pick up your paycheck, etc. And it involves standing in lines or people berating you. You're stuck doing tedious annoying repetitive tasks, or you can get a flamethrower. I think standing in line to get Gary Coleman's autograph takes 90 minutes if you do it normally.

Otherwise it's very silly early 2000s edgy white guy dudebro humor

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You're stuck doing tedious annoying repetitive tasks, or you can get a flamethrower.

That premise, while cute, hasn't aged well for me. The ever-rising number of chanlords shooting up their schools (and elder chanlords murder-suiciding their own families) because no one would blow them behind the bleachers (or because the wife left him or the kids won't call anymore) sours the premise of "wouldn't it be funny to murder everyone that mildly annoyed you" white guy dudebro humor for me long ago.

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"Yo its a video game"

Yeah, and that changes nothing about why I don't like it. You're giving a lazy thought terminating cliche here.

EDIT: Christ, you activated a long dormant alt account just to stan for your edgy video game? That's just sad.

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is my only lemmy account and I made it before reddit killed 3rd party apps as I quit going on there. Going through my post history to try and judge me is something weird to do though

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Going through my post history to try and judge me is something weird to do though

Rising from dormancy while otherwise doing nothing with that account, just to announce how mad you are that your edgy game wasn't to my liking is weirder to me.

"Yo its just an opinion"