this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
66 points (88.4% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
3438 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

https://cara.app/about

Not federated, but still good to see some alternatives

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 58 points 5 months ago (7 children)

No idea why people post YT videos instead of articles. Brad McChad here waffling for seven minutes to supply enough information for a 30 second paragraph -

AI summary -

Tech reviewer Brad discusses the mass migration of artists from Instagram to the new social network Cara. With over half a million new users in just a few days, Cara offers artists protection for their work from being used in AI models and community-vouched portfolio accounts that filter out AI art. Instagram, on the other hand, has been losing favor due to decreased algorithm traction, drops in followers and engagement, and a focus on viral content. The final straw came when Instagram started allowing users to opt out of their AI training models, leaving artists feeling disregarded. Cara, self-funded by its creator Jinga Zang, provides a refreshing alternative to Instagram, with potential to operate as a normal business without investor pressure. The controversy surrounding Meta (formerly Facebook) and its AI models, which led to a mass exodus of artists, was also discussed, with concerns over users' ability to opt out of having their work used in these models. Despite the challenges Cara faces as a new social network, the speaker expresses support for the platform and encourages viewers to check it out.

[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Thank you for this. It's astounding to me that somehow we have the attention span for a 7 minute video but not a thirty second article.

[–] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 14 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This is a great tool -

https://www.summarize.tech/

Not as much of a tool as Brad McChad tho mind

[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I didn't realize that was a real name, I thought you were just making fun of the guy

[–] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

I wouldn't make fun of Brad

But his brother Jihad however...

[–] rovingnothing29@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

With a name like Brad McChad you gotta blame the parents. It's like naming a kid Jeeves, you've almost put their life on rails.

[–] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

I knew a guy called Willy Dick once. And this time I'm not joking

[–] aramova@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Totally agree, and still chuckle at the fact that it's an AI summary of a video about how artists are leaving a platform due to AI.

🤌

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 5 points 5 months ago

Was it a 30 second paragraph because you had AI summarize it? 🤔

[–] tigerjerusalem@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Well, the main thing from Brad is reviewing tech for artists and showing how the product is used, so video makes sense. Videos like this are not that usual.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

I just post wherever I see it first. I did actually search for articles about this one cause I know people prefer it, but it saw no indication in mainstream tech sites. It seems to have flown under the radar.

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee -5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If I can listen to a human-narrated, 8-minute info dump passively, I'll chose that over 30s of reading "AI-summarised" wall of text any time.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 6 points 5 months ago

For me it's absolutely the opposite. But hey, at least now we both have options.

BTW, since you watched the video might I ask you to take the time to check the paragraph above, and see if you spot any important details missing that are in the video?

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

To get abused again by yet more anti-libre software, malware. Some people never learn.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

two competing ones are better than one at least.

[–] randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago

"Kumbaya my lord "

  • South park season 8 episode 9
[–] pipe@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I like that the owner is an artist herself, they aren't VC backed, and they don't allow AI generated art. The verification process for accounts is interesting. I'll be interested to see where it goes from here.

[–] cyrus@sopuli.xyz 8 points 5 months ago

The "NO AI" clause is conditional, though.

As mentioned in their FAQ, they will reverse that rule when it is "viable in terms of data privacy and ethicality"

unless the rampant ethical and data privacy issues around datasets are resolved via regulation.

Whilst they aren't VC-Backed, their servers already had to do nearly 10 upgrades, their "AI Detection" is backed by another, third-party AI, and it's not transparent what said service is.

And to top it off, it's a closed ecosystem. You upload your art there, and either Cara dies one day and your following is gone, or they change their policies, leadership or anything else, at which point everyone will have to move again

it's yet another case where the Fediverse and other Federated networks address the core issue that lead to this disaster - content ownership - better than systems like these do. I'm not hopeful for Cara.

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago

People just will not learn from the mistakes of the past.