this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
50 points (89.1% liked)

Technology

60589 readers
3662 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (11 children)
[–] Nothingwise@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Firefox + uBlock Origin + arkenfox user.js gives you privacy, security and anti-tracking. The only way to fly IMO.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And a Pi Hole for good measure.

[–] AProfessional@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A dns blocker cannot do anything more than ublock. It is nice for other apps though.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

A DNS blocker is great for other devices on your network!

[–] ToNIX@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Or Adguard Home, that I think is superior than Pi-Hole. It runs as a single instance and you can easily upgrade it from the web UI.

[–] XpeeN@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

White list firewall. Because this is the real reason everyone has a right to ad block. Ads are hidden links to other websites. It's like walking through a gauntlet of pick pockets bribing the credit card company just to make it to the checkout at your local grocery store, or some asshole you invite into your home that goes to the bathroom, opens a window, and lets a dozen random people in your home if they pay a dollar for the access. The entire system is based on stalking people. It is criminal.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nocturne213@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (11 children)

I bounced between the two for years, i guess i am going back to Firefox full time.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] mrsgreenpotato@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I am using Brave on iOS mainly because of its superb YouTube support - It has a built in ad block, can download videos offline and play minimized. Is there any way I can achieve this with any other browser? I would switch immediately.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

The ceo is a bigoted asshole, Brave is chromium, it was initially funded by Peter Thiel and they're literally just trying to make their own adsense network.

The self-proclaimed privacy focused browser is tracking your browsing and want to serve you personalized ads, and I think they want to use that tracking data for AI training as well, meaning other people can potentially access it.

And lets not forget about their crypto currency that you can earn by turning on special ads. Which they seemingly unironically called it "Basic Attent Tokens"..

TL;DR: The company is basically a sham company trying to usher in a dystopia. Where you'll get paid for staring at ads, while having all your data stolen and sold back to you.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] blue_zephyr@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The fact that their founder wants to ban gay marriage is enough reason for me to avoid it like the plague.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] arc@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Brave is a marching band of red flags. It claims privacy while injecting ads, affiliate codes and crypto into the browser. It's kind of sad to see someone like Brendan Eich who should know better turn to the dark side and pretend this is all fine. It isn't.

Best advice I could give for anyone who wants privacy is use Firefox or a branch of it. Firefox is out of the box the most privacy conscious mainstream browser and add-ons make it more so. If you want absolute privacy you could even use a derivative like Tor Browser.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] stooovie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I have absolutely no idea how Brave got the reputation it has. It's business model is disgusting and extortionate, it's like paying for warez. Been clear as day since day one.

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago

Damn didnt know it was that bad.

They also lack any documentation about how to use their policies on Linux (where you can disable all the bloat). But it should be doable, I will give it another try.

Is the browser even FOSS? Can you compile a working version yourself?

I do that with Firefox and it is really cool.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Today I learned that people take it VERY PERSONALLY when you criticize their chosen browser. 😂

[–] AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

At one point they were scummy enough to automatically add their referral codes to any Amazon link you see. Lots of people today still mindlessly recommend Brave, and that's what's wrong in general with the "but the UX is so nice" mentality.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Lots of people today still mindlessly recommend Brave

It starts to feel astroturfed at a certain point. The last week or so has been crazy.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] rog@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I dont know why anyone would leave chrome and land on something like brave.

If youre ditching chrome, which you should, go to an actual different browser and use Firefox.

[–] hayes_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Personal anecdote:

When I initially decided to drop Chrome, I moved to Brave because - as a chromium-based browser - it supported the same set of extensions I’d grown accustomed to.

That being said, the crypto stuff weirded me out enough that, once I’d weaned myself off the extensions, I switched to Firefox.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Streaming services seem to lower bitrate when I’m using Firefox vs Brave, so Brave is my go to for streaming.

I use Firefox for everything else.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Chromium has metric shit tons of work done that seems to perform great. What I would love to see is for Mozilla to fork Chromium, staff it with enough people to maintain it, add/remove the features they feel are appropriate/inappropriate, and thus reuse the tons of free work Google and others have already done. As a software engineer, I don't buy the argument that it's easier to correctly implement every new web feature anew than maintaining a fork. Every large org that ships anything based on Android for example maintains a fork of an even bigger codebase. It's not as complicated as people make it out to be. It's not a new problem and there are strategies to manage it. If Mozilla does this, they'll be able to play an active role in steering by far the biggest rendering engine's direction, instead of playing opposition with no stake in it. Now downvote away! 😄

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] batman654987@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 10 months ago

This is bulshit, didnt have to say aything in tehnical aspect of the browser so he continyed to tras some people that work on that project, probably false..

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

urghhhhh but firefox just doesn't perform as well. i tried, i really did. i found a 15 year old (!!) bug affecting svg drawing performance that was fucking up a page i was working on, i'm not imagining it.

I'm not sure if it's the same one but i just found a similar bug with a five year old comment saying i guess we're not fixing it anytime soon... https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483868

I do have it installed and check in occasionally but it feels like a downgrade when i try to use it as a daily driver.

is there any way to get a functional de-googled chromium build with settings sync across devices?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] alvanrahimli@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, there are the ame stuff about Firefox too. Mozilla Foundation is such a corrupt organization with extreme shady finances.

Foundation's main income is royalties by google: 567M per year.

Donations: 7M (which almost goes to the CEO's bonuses)

the CEO gets 700K salary and 4.6M bonuses. Lmao.

I'd suggest, using Firefox but not donating to them.

[–] prosp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

I come from the future, now CEO's salary is almost 9M.

[–] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If software works I'll use it.

I prefer firefox but I'm not going to tell someone not to use a piece of software because the creator is a retard.

Learn to be angry at the right things and grow up. Jesus fucking christ people are so god damn stupid now days.

"Waahh I don't like this guys political position so I'm going to try to defame all his work and the work of hundreds of others because of one guys personal opinion"

If this had said something like 'v3 manifest will be rolled out and they're going to be anti-anonymity' then I'd be salty because that would mean the software is becoming less useful.

Anyone who thinks like this should stop using the internet because, spoiler, the entire backbone of the internet has been contributed to by everyone of every faith, creed and philosophy which means thousands of people you 'hate' have contributed to your literal bitching about those very people online.

Get over yourselves. Actual fucking children.

This author is a moron.

Use firefox (or librefox).

[–] danhab99@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Why was appointing Eich as CEO so controversial? It's because he donated $1,000 in support of California's Proposition 8 in 2008, which was a proposed amendment to California's state constitution to ban same-sex marriage.

Besides this I cannot find another good reason not to use brave. Nobody point to a specific line of code that ruins privacy, not enough reasons.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] febra@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So the CEO is a raging alt-righter. Glad I never used his product then.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Milk_SDF_Possum@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

I agree that you shouldn't use Brave browser cause of things they've done in the past but, oh Jesus, that article is so stupid it reminds me the Hogwarts Legacy boycott.

load more comments
view more: next ›