this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
501 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

59495 readers
3110 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/536301

Archived link

The Russia’s State Social University (RSSU) has launched a “social rating” platform that claims to build a person’s “social portrait” with possible applications in future government policies.

Named “We,” the platform promises to determine a user’s comparative “social status” based on a survey that includes questions about income, family status, benefits, creditworthiness, criminal record, lifestyle and state awards, among others.

“The social rating figures don’t affect [a person’s] life, the availability of services or the career trajectory in any way,” RSSU said on the platform’s website. “But who knows what these figures will mean for you in the future?”

Observers on social media compared the platform’s name “We” to the highly influential 1921 dystopian novel of the same name by Russian author Yevgeny Zamyatin. [The novel "We" describes a world of harmony and conformity within a united totalitarian state. It inspired British author George Orwell to write his own novel, "Nineteen Eighty-Four", which was published in 1949.]

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 124 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well this sounds a bit familiar...

Next step is adding a scoring system with penalties for certain behavior and it will be quite similar to the social system that is rolling out in China...

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 56 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's probably the inspiration, but like hell they'll manage to actually build something as functional.

[–] silkroadtraveler@lemmy.today 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I wouldn’t underestimate the engineering competence of Russians especially when it comes to autocratic surveillance tools. There are plenty of Russian-built tools and web apps that function quite well - Yandex, VK, etc. The west does not have a monopoly on innovation.

[–] nexusband@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (6 children)

The west does not have a monopoly on innovation.

Nope - but it does look like we have the "monopoly" of being able to call out bullshit openly and not fear falling out of a window. Or being stabbed.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago

Oh that's coming. Stay tuned.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Yandex is a good example, VK - I'm not certain of that.

Anyway, what I meant is that such kind of social rating needs to source data from somewhere. That means integration with quite a lot of systems built for the Russian state, which often suck a lot. It's normal that half the time remote payments for utilities don't work, for example.

I mean, yeah, they can. But if it's going to be some nation-wide system for the government, the bureaucracy will practically kill this.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Eric_Pollock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 110 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Observers on social media compared the platform’s name “We” to the highly influential 1921 dystopian novel of the same name by Russian author Yevgeny Zamyatin.

They actually couldn't choose a different name than the novel that was written specifically about this very dystopian subject? Did they use it as inspiration? Because that seems more than coincidence...

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Weibo and WeChat hide

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It's a blocking method. If 90% of the people who search a term are looking for the social platform it becomes much harder to find the book. Think of it like trying to find archival news articles about a perennial topic. You have to wade through all the recent shit and then there's 2 hits from the time period you're checking.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 83 points 4 months ago (3 children)

The social rating figures don’t affect [a person’s] life, the availability of services or the career trajectory in any way

unless you're gay...

[–] el_abuelo@lemmy.ml 36 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There are no gay people in Russia.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 months ago

shoots gun

Not anymore

[–] downpunxx@fedia.io 22 points 4 months ago
The social rating figures don’t affect [a person’s] life, the availability of services or the career trajectory in any way

wink

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 64 points 4 months ago (3 children)

This is literally the plot for a Black Mirror episode.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 79 points 4 months ago

This is literally the plot for *China.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

From. Nosedive to be specific.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think for was actually the right word choice there, because Black Mirror in no way came up with the concept

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

or, for an example with better writing, a Community episode

[–] souperk@reddthat.com 41 points 4 months ago (3 children)

They made meow meow beans?

[–] FutileRecipe@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

They've taken everything subjective and unspoken about human interaction and reduced it to explicit, objective numbers. I've never felt so alive.

[–] muse@fedia.io 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

good timing, its my birthday today

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Cool.

Cool cool cool.

[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 38 points 4 months ago

I see the North Korea visit was pretty useful

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 37 points 4 months ago (3 children)

“The social rating figures don’t affect [a person’s] life, the availability of services or the career trajectory in any way,” RSSU said on the platform’s website. “But who knows what these figures will mean for you in the future?”

Well that's a relief...

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

When was the last time an entity that generated stats about someone didn’t end up with those stats being used to the detriment of the individual - or at the very least for the profit of another?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 4 months ago

There was me thinking it could be used for something sinister.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago

Let's see how the Make Russia China campaign goes!

[–] Deway@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago

I give this news 5 MeowMeowBeenz.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 18 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Oh shit it’s meow meow beans

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You can see why all the M-Ls on this site want Russia to win their fascist invasion. Clearly the Revolution lives.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Some .ml fellas can explain that this is good, actually. Oil oligarch kleptocracy with murdering political opponent characteristics is one of the most leftist governments possible, so everything they do is good.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 16 points 4 months ago (9 children)

...but who knows...

Yeeaaaahhhhh, about that. We are totally not going the China way, its just that we are because fuck you.

Russia is a maffia state and should be dismantled, prove me wrong.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Omg, the RSSU, lmao. How is this not the Onion?

[–] uis@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

What's wrong with RSS-- Oh. Well, Putinism is opposite of communism.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gsus4@programming.dev 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (12 children)

Named “We,” the platform promises to determine a user’s comparative “social status” based on a survey that includes questions about income, family status, benefits, creditworthiness, criminal record, lifestyle and state awards, among others.

Criminal record: putin's scoreboard of excellency https://www.scmp.com/news/world/europe/article/3174724/russias-putin-decorates-army-unit-accused-ukraine-war-crimes

How many putinpoints do they get for using a 3 to 13million$ Kh-101 cruise missile to bomb a children's hospital chemo ward?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Russia can into tinpot dictator.

[–] downpunxx@fedia.io 13 points 4 months ago

sounds like kgb with extra steps

[–] uis@lemm.ee 11 points 4 months ago

Putinism as it is. Oligarchy and survailance.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Seems like RSSU is fishing for the government's money.

It's probably very badly implemented and doesn't work as described. In a sense this is good, but my point stands.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

The devs of this planet are lazy and rehashing content.

load more comments
view more: next ›