this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59569 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A lawsuit filed by more victims of the sex trafficking operation claims that Pornhub’s moderation staff ignored reports of their abuse videos.


Sixty-one additional women are suing Pornhub’s parent company, claiming that the company failed to take down videos of their abuse as part of the sex trafficking operation Girls Do Porn. They’re suing the company and its sites for sex trafficking, racketeering, conspiracy to commit racketeering, and human trafficking.

The complaint, filed on Tuesday, includes what it claims are internal emails obtained by the plaintiffs, represented by Holm Law Group, between Pornhub moderation staff. The emails allegedly show that Pornhub had only one moderator to review 700,000 potentially abusive videos, and that the company intentionally ignored repeated reports from victims in those videos.

The damages and restitution they seek amounts to more than $311,100,000. They demand a jury trial, and seek damages of $5 million per plaintiff, as well as restitution for all the money Aylo, the new name for Pornhub’s parent company, earned “marketing, selling and exploiting Plaintiffs’ videos in an amount that exceeds one hundred thousand dollars for each plaintiff.”

The plaintiffs are 61 more unnamed “Jane Doe” victims of Girls Do Porn, adding to the 60 that sued Pornhub in 2020 for similar claims.
Girls Do Porn was a federally-convicted sex trafficking ring that coerced young women into filming pornographic videos under the pretense of “modeling” gigs. In some cases, the women were violently abused. The operators told them that the videos would never appear online, so that their home communities wouldn’t find out, but they uploaded the footage to sites like Pornhub, where the videos went viral—and in many instances, destroyed their lives. Girls Do Porn was an official Pornhub content partner, with its videos frequently appearing on the front page, where they gathered millions of views.

read more: https://www.404media.co/girls-do-porn-victims-sue-pornhub-for-300-million/

archive: https://archive.ph/zQWt3#selection-593.0-609.599

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mojo@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The emails allegedly show that Pornhub had only one moderator to review 700,000 potentially abusive videos(...)

Well that'd be an interesting job to put on a resume

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

and here I was reviewing them for free...

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can we have AI generated porn now ?

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Time for even more impossible beauty standards!

[–] Rawdogg@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Most beauty standards are held by women tbh

[–] eatthecake@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Such a reductive take. Maybe they want porn that isn't borderline, or questionable. Something where there's zero potential for abuse. Unless you yourself are privy to the inner workings of each company and the story of each model individually, then you're running into a risk of stuff not being kosher just by nature of the content.

Plus, yeah, what about people who are into more extreme things? May as well let them have an outlet for their desires that doesn't actually have anyone getting raped.

[–] eatthecake@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

May as well let them have an outlet yeah? Some of us dont want to live on that planet. I dont even want to live on the essential porn planet. As if men need more stimulation. Can the penis not be the center of the universe? Nope? Well fuck off then and take your porn requirement with you. I dont know know why your penis needs are foisted on people like me. Im just searching the internet but i have porn forced on me because of you. Rape porn, child porn, disgusting shit i never want to see but apparemtly its popular with dickbrains. Bugger the lott of you.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Removed my comment as the subject has been discussed fully by others with you already.

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I always hated GDP videos cause the girls never looked like they wanted to be there, now I know why, they didn't. There's a lot of porn out there where the girl is very clearly not enjoying it or just laying there, I don't know how anyone finds that hot.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly I'm running into that a lot with women, especially younger women. They all want to be "dominated" and it does nothing for me.

Consensual non-consent is also surprisingly common with younger women as well. Makes me very uncomfortable.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Rapists.

Rapists find it hot.

Like the rapists that ran GDP.

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 1 year ago

Or, like, half of the BDSM community who enjoy when this is roleplayed, like what everyone watching these videos thought it was.

Unless you think anyone who plays video games with guns only find it fun cause theyre murderers?

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Given their videos were so highly ranked, the prevalence of coercion in the industry, and the fact that it's often impossible to tell if someone's been threatened behind the scenes, it's highly likely that most people reading this who have watched porn online have also watched plenty of videos of actual rapes.

This is a simple fact, but one which a lot of people would rather deny, rather than admit their part in perpetuating it, while wondering why watching porn makes them sad. Partly, I suspect, because deep down they know the truth of it.

[–] eatthecake@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I have never watched porn. Some would say that makes me inhuman but it can be done. Those of us with experience in the sex industry would never say 'sex positive'.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder how many products you've bought in your life were made by child labor.

[–] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There is no ethical consumption under capitalism

[–] loopedcandle@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I am a regular consumer of online porn. And I'll admit, I loved their videos. Now knowing what was going on, that's on me to do some thinking, i have probably watched a rape and helped the perpetrator make money from that act. That's hard on the conscience. I don't know what to think about it.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

The fault lies squarely on the shoulders of the producers. You hold as much guilt for that action as anyone who has ever purchased a cell phone has for the conditions for the workers are subjected to. Which isn't to say 0, but it's so small that it may as well be.

[–] eatthecake@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Really? You don't know how to feel about jerking off to rape? I know how to feel about you. POS.

[–] Rengoku@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Save your fucking houlier than thou attitude for yourself.

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

Think the free and open internet dream is dead.

Corporations are going to rule the world.

The amateur porn glory days are gone.