this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
59 points (95.4% liked)

Games

16785 readers
826 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
59
Nintendo’s new Zelda timeline includes Breath of Wild and Tears of Kingdom as standalone (mynintendonews.com)
submitted 2 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I liked the theory that each one was just in the distant future from each other (like thousands or millions of years maybe). It's interesting that there's an actual lore between games, especially that the original Zelda is from a timeline where OoT Link loses, and I guess kid OoT Link and adult OoT Link have different timelines.

[–] morbidcactus@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Isn't windwaker following the adult timeline and twilight princess the kid one but both where Link succeeds?

Guess it kinda makes sense if you think about it as a split at the end of oot? Idk, timeline is wild and I never thought about it too much.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So is it like, save everyone as a kid, save everyone as an adult, and total failure? How does OoT end? Do you beat Ganondorf in the future and the past?

[–] morbidcactus@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Afaik the timeline after beating the game splits, the adult timeline carries on from there and then the child timeline carries on as if Gannondorf never took over in the first place

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Really don't get this obsession fans have with tying all these games together.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fans? This is an official source from Nintendo, how is this fans being weird? 😅

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

The only reason the timeline exists is because fans kept asking for one.

[–] Dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

I think it's fun to imagine a deep world that can explain all these variations of reality like stitching all the fromsoft games into a single universe.

[–] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

You would think the fact that Hyrule is always different (sometimes even having a Lorule) and one of the most popular entries (remade three times) was a literal fever dream, that people would say realize the only actual Link is the character we played on the way.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

I thought it was just that they're set far into the future

[–] Podunk@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I for one like the idea that hyrule is some crazy oroboros of rhyming timelines.

Theres no reason it has to be that way, but i like it.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I’ve no idea why anyone takes the idea of a Zelda timeline even remotely seriously.

[–] ApollosArrow@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

No different than people being into star trek, star wars, a song of fire and ice, DC or Marvel lore. People like stories they can converse over. Timelines are yet another piece to talk about.

[–] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Because Nintendo made one. They published the "official" timeline like a decade ago, and then made a TON of references to it in Breath of the Wild. Not our fault they then decided to shit on it with Tears of the Kingdom.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What's a work of fiction that you care about? Possibly something formative to your childhood, or something that was just really damn good and you love it?

Now imagine the author/artist/dev/whatever making some boneheaded decisions that make this thing you love worse in petty and annoying ways that don't really matter but they should know better since they've been doing it longer than you've been alive.

If you can imagine this scenario, then you understand why zelda fans are upset, again

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah I'm disappointed rhat they shifted from 'so far in the future it's irrelevant' to 'let's soft reboot the whole thing'.

Imagine TOTK as not an overstuffed addon, but set during the war with Demise. But then they'd have to deal with that pesky triforce again...

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I can't think of many things I care less about than fictional things being reworked. They're fiction. "There has to be this truth to this fiction!" is something that will never keep me awake at night and is completely foreign to me. It's like the same shit when people started whining that the ghost busters are girls, and that Ariel can't be black. is it entertaining, is the only question I care about.

And don't get me wrong, I get upset when I watch my sports teams so I'm not, by any stretch of the imagination, above getting upset over stupid shit. Lol