this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024
-65 points (21.7% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
2891 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CthuluVoIP@lemmy.world 56 points 10 months ago (4 children)

This article is basically summed up: “VPNs don’t completely eliminate your digital footprint, so don’t use them unless you need to accomplish these specific things.”

It seems pretty disingenuous to discourage people from taking steps to protect their privacy in this way. It may not be sponsored, but it’s still bullshit.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There's a whole segment of humanity who refuse to do anything. Perfect is the enemy of good in their mind. Better to do nothing than not be perfect.

You don't need curtains.. most people are polite enough not to watch you, and peeping toms are already illegal. Besides a peeping tom could break into your house at any time, so curtains are pointless.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

They are the specific thing that I do while using the internet too.

But you’re right that any use of the internet could use any increase towards privacy.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 39 points 10 months ago

useless article. mentions dns: zero times.

He is so focused on the client he loses track of why you'd not want your local isp to do anything more than route your vpnd packets.

[–] lovesickoyster@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This article is such bullshit - every single paragraph is the same "vpn protects you against this but there's this fringe case where it does not so you don't need a vpn". Corbin, you shit the bed on this one.

[–] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I most definitely do need a VPN. I'm completely over being subscribed to multiple streaming services and trying to remember/figure out which one has which shows. VPN service is cheaper and everything I want to watch ends up in one place. 🦜🏴‍☠️

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

The article specifically states that using one for piracy is recommended. Hence the use of the word "probably" in the title.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 10 months ago

Nice try FBI.

[–] rizoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 10 months ago

Protect your privacy and use a no log VPN. This article is just as much bs as he claims VPN marketing is.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Get fucked.

[–] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago

The ol "I had a quota to fill and I hate and/or don't understand something people like" form of journalism again I see.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

https://www.privacyguides.org/en/basics/vpn-overview/

If you want to real, reasoned, nuanced discussion of the benefits and costs of using a VPN. I cannot recommend privacy guides highly enough

Tldr: VPNs are great, at obscuring your local traffic from your ISP, but then the VPN can see your traffic. You have to think about the trade-offs in your scenario

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] BlackPit@feddit.ch 2 points 10 months ago

This article is disingenuous at best and either fueled by ignorance or malice. Another comment suggested it wasn't officially sponsored, but it still could've been bought. Having said, I have to agree with some of the sentiment. I've seen advertising on public TV from the likes of NordVPN that is downright fraudulent. Their claims are deceptive and unfounded. Then there's the recent acquisition of Express and PIA by an old school scammer/spammer. Additionally, many free VPNs are actually surveillance malware and SHOULD be avoided. Any encryption offered publicly by large corporate data-stealing privacy-abusing parasites should be avoided in any form.

For anyone reading this that is hesitant to using VPN because of the article, be encouraged that VPNs are extremely effective at securing your data during transit. They are NOT an outright privacy tool, but can be used as part of your privacy plan. VPNs do NOT make you anonymous! A truthful VPN service provider will say this openly. Like IVPN (Bottom of front page) and Mullvad , both of which attempt to educate customers .

If you're someone who finds it hard to trust any company whatsoever, then you can host VPN yourself. Admittedly a learning curve to hurdle, but regardless of which method you choose, if your provider is genuine then I see it as a necessity in the effort to keep loved ones safer.

[–] BlackSkinnedJew@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 10 months ago
[–] OfficerBribe@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Do not understand the downvotes and comments saying article is bullshit. Maybe it all depends on country / ISP, but I have never even thought I need VPN where I live. And since practically all sites indeed use HTTPS all they could get are IPs and possibly hostnames (I do not use ISP DNS).

Have always disliked VPN ads especially when they talk about security benefits. Regular Joe who has no idea about any of this hears those ads and indeed thinks without this magical technology you are now at serious risk your bank details could get stolen by anyone. Not to mention the claims of speed worded in such way that it seems you will get faster network.

Only meaningful reason I can think of privacy wise are these scenarios:

A)

  1. You have a static IP and it gets leaked with other info like your real name / personal mail address from site A
  2. Only your IP is leaked for site B
  3. By cross referencing site A and B info, you can determine identity for site B user

B)

  1. You have a static IP and it gets leaked with other info like your real name / personal mail address from site A
  2. You visit site B and whoever has logs of that site could tie your actions to your identity by using leaks from site A breach
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Just use Mullvad or Tor, this article is garbage

[–] TheDeepState@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

In order to get back on Reddit, I need a VPN.