this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
70 points (97.3% liked)

Fediverse

28444 readers
883 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Lemmy mentioned\( °□° )/

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RagingHungryPanda@lemm.ee 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Tl;dr - fediverse probably won't do too much, and it does have discoverability issues, along with migration issues

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Discoverability issues as per yesterdays search giants methods of crawling the web.

It's quite clear that companies like Google and Microsoft are vulnerable in the search game right now.

I mean in the end you're probably right, but if there were ever a time for a well-funded group to take aim at the suddenly low barriered entry, I think this is probably Custer's last stand.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Another paper that equates not changing the world with being a complete failure.

A valid viewpoint, I suppose, but some Fedi-things have certainly improved my life, which really, is how these things work: you improve people's lives incrementally, and not by the hundreds of millions at once.

Of course, that means this is a complete failure because we won't accept anything other than massive global success as success anymore because... reasons?

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago

Not only that but ... here we are. 🤷‍♂️

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago

pretty brief paper though ngl, it doesn't do much

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 4 points 2 months ago

They define decentralisation as an even distribution of users? Or did I get that wrong skimming the paper?

This seems arbitrary. Mastodon is a decentralised network, no matter how big Mastodon.social is. Lemmy is equally decentralised, even though there's a dominant actor.

The other hubs in the network don't revolve around mastodon.social/lemmy.world. they connect to each other bilaterally - if the central hubs disappeared over night it wouldn't affect them all that much.

I think the notion that decentralised networks can't have hubs of varying sizes is plain wrong, and a fundamental misunderstanding of what decentralized means.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I don't care if 99% of users are on once instance as long as people have the option to create their own instances and build on tech software and content created by the community.