this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
649 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

59495 readers
3114 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 94 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You know, in some ways, I appreciate Musk. He has gone out of his way to demonstrate, for all to see, how billionaire parasites get to fail upward no matter how irredeemably incompetent and vile they happen to be.

Scumwads like gates and Bezos hides it all behind walls of pr propaganda, but not Musk.

I wonder what a cyberguillotine would look like.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Cyberguillotine is the door of the Cybertruck's trunk, which famously has no sensor to block closing it when something is in the way, and is powerful and sharp enough to cut fingers.

[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It can sense when something's blocking it from closing all the way. It was just foolishly programmed to only pop back open a few times. Think it was the third or fourth was where it went into guillotine mode.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I'm pretty sure that was after an update and the original release did not give a shit

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 90 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (14 children)

We gotta stop calling software updates recalls. Yeah I get that it’s fun to bash on the Cybertruck but this isn’t really that interesting.

Now that sticky accelerator pedal… yikes.

[–] aard@kyu.de 153 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Recall is a legal term for the car industry which includes stuff like reporting obligations. So if the defect meets the severity level of a recall it should be called as such, even if it is 'just' a software update. Ambiguous terms for safety violations are dangerous and may cost lives.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 55 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Recall is also the plural term for a group of Cybertrucks.

[–] terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bruh, if this platform had gold id give.

Take these instead: 🪙🪙🪙

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Rear view cameras have been federally required on passenger vehicles since module year 2018 in the US market. So yeah, regardless of the error, it's a recall because the result makes the vehicle noncompliant.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] bladerunnerspider@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Yeah..... But these are multi-ton vehicles and when they crash people die. Unlike when your computer crashes.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

I’ve had software recalls for Toyotas and Hondas, both of which involved physical recall paperwork and required me to visit a dealer to install the new software.

Just because a software recall can be remedied over the air it doesn’t make it any less of a recall. As others have said, there’s a legal definition to a recall. They are issued by the NHTSA and require specific legal responses from the manufacturer.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

On the one hand I agree, but also just because it can be fixed over the air doesn't mean it's not a major problem.

Plus imagine if a car manufacturer put VERY shitty software into their cars. If a manufacturer has 100 recalls a year, I want to know why. If they have 1, I want to know why.

Just because they are more easily fixed, doesn't mean the recall isn't important.

[–] weew@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are also plenty of dumb, nearly inconsequential recalls on regular cars too. Including things like "place this warning sticker in your manual". That's a recall.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

If the vehicle was sold broken and has to be fixed, it’s a recall.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago (16 children)

You can tell Elon is a genius because he gets people to pay to do prototype testing for him.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Mercuri@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Tesla ~~engineers~~ managers treating it like software. "Ship it and we can patch it in production."

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You know it's never the engineers and always the managers even with software, right?

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

always the managers even with software

You know, I want this to be 100% true, but it's not.

I've been in software development for over a decade and while the managers are definitely high up there on the list of causing problems, I've also worked with enough shitty developers that don't care enough. Then not everyone provides the same level of code review, some people are pretty bad at it and just rubber stamp things, and then a problem gets through.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

One of these days, an engineer, the best and the brightest of us, will invent a way for it to be technically impossible to fix in production. They will be a hero, and save hundreds of companies from bad decisions, and they will never become famous or wealthy for it.

[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

As much as I think the cybertruck is a stupid vehicle and agree that teslas are built like shit, from what I understand this isn't an atypical amount of recalls for a new vehicle platform.

Without even paying much attention the two I know of, the gas pedal and the finger slicer are unacceptable however.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jagothaciv@kbin.earth 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What’s funny to me is there is nothing new in it. It’s trumped up garbage. It still has a chassis and 4 wheels. Nothing new. It’s stuffed with old tech that doesn’t work. These losers are guinea pigs and probably get scammed annually.

[–] red@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Steer by wire is pretty much the only cool thing. It exists elsewhere sure, but not in vehicles of this size

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just dropping a link to the relevant, most recent upload from Some More News aka Cody's Showdy. TL;DW: the cyber truck is an oversized, overpriced, unreliable, terrible design that's dangerous to everybody in and around it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Tesla? Making shoddy vehicles?

shockedpicachu.jpeg

[–] MoonRaven@feddit.nl 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The folks at Some More News made a really great point: The truck segment is ripe for disruption. People who need trucks hate the monstrosities that truck companies are putting out. The Cybertruck, however, isn't disrupting the market. It just looks weird. It's just as heavy and big as other trucks.

Imagine if a company put out a small truck. Not too powerful, not too big, good sight lines and a nice, big bed. That would be disruptive.

Then again, I'm a Harbinger of Failure and listening to me is probably a bad idea. I assume people aren't fucking idiots so maybe just build bigger and bigger trucks that are less and less useful

[–] MoonRaven@feddit.nl 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As a European. Most of the people don't need a freaking truck. Big or small. In the rare cases you do need to move something, just rent a van. It will save you a lot of gas and money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago

I see Cybertrucks all the time. Everything about it is so ridiculous that I am genuinely embarrassed for the driver. I think it is the scale. If it was the size of a Hyundai Santa Cruz, the aesthetic might work...maybe. It just looks silly, gawdy, unfinished, and cheap.

[–] KonalaKoala@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

At this rate, they are better off just scraping the Cybertruck and issue refunds to everyone who was stupid enough to buy one.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago

Oh yeah, here's Some More News on that.

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

My new Hyundai did this, sorta, and it also had to be recalled. Shifting into reverse would immediately display the rear view camera (good) but then about 25% of the time it would flash a dialogue box on top of the display with instructions on how to operate the display (bad). You could select “Dismiss” or “Don’t Show This Again”. Selecting “Don’t show This Again” did nothing (worse). With the dialog present you could not see the rear view camera display and if you are one of many drivers with muscle memory, the car was already rolling backwards when you realize you cannot see (unacceptable).

Elon sucks and I would never buy a Tesla but just adding this as a reference point that software in cars generally sucks.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At least your Hyundai had a working rearview mirror so you had another way to see behind you.

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

design shoulda gone into the circular filing system at the beginning

load more comments
view more: next ›