HK65

joined 11 months ago
[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 week ago

I guess nobody is committing genocide with Pride flags on their arms, that's the difference.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago

This.

Hungary has this thing where the agitprop always gets some footage taken before the protest starts so the crowd looks smaller as it's only the early people there from police drones.

You can't fly your own drone to counter the narrative.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

Iran already tried to kill Trump before the election

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago

about laws in general

Terms of Service aren't laws. Breaking them is not illegal. It's like using the waterslide while sitting and not lying on your back. In fact, it's explicitly legal to use an adblocker and control what happens on your device in both the EU and the US. There are ongoing debates whether the surveillance required for blocking adblockers is legal in the EU.

Google does break laws all the time by the way, and is holding a monopoly. If people had to pay for Youtube, alternatives would spring up overnight, but since you can still watch Youtube free, they can't.

Also, I'd be the happiest person if Google finally figured out how to block people with adblockers completely, so that the majority of people would wean themselves off of one of the world's biggest disinfo peddlers.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Tencent would never allow it.

The US has a sale-or-ban order in force right now, it is not up to Tencent, but the Taco King right now.

Besides it’s software, that has no subsidiaries.

You must mean assets. I'm talking about the legal entity, that's what subsidiary means, a local US sub-company owned by the Chinese parent company. US Tiktok operations are owned by the local US subsidiary Tiktok Inc, incorporated in California, owned by Bytedance. That ownership relation is entirely regulated by US law.

In this case there is nothing to steal.

$10 billion in US revenue, the market share and the cultural, societal and political impact of the platform is there for the taking.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

You can do so to the local subsidiary

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)
[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Do German developers call a bug a Kafer? (I have no umlaut on my keyboard)

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago

Looks very Yugioh

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh they'll force you to use it. It will be shoved into every service you use, also ones you need to use. You will not be able to do your work, access government services, or live your life without going through them.

Late stage capitalism has killed the free market a while ago.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Throwing a ball is about as easy as throwing a stick.

Yeah but the stick goes further because all the weight is at the end so it gets more momentum on the same throwing arc

 

So creating a new repo on GitHub, you get a set of getting started steps. They changed the default branchname to "main" from "master" due to its connotations with slavery.

When I create a new repo now, the initial getting started steps recommend creating a branch named "master" as opposed to "main" as it was a while ago.

It's especially weird since the line git branch -M master is completely unnecessary, since git init still sets you up with a "master" branch.

Disclaimer: I have a bunch of private repos, and my default branchnames are pretty much all "master".

Is this a recent change?

Edit: Mystery solved, my default branchname is "master". Thanks bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone !

view more: next ›