this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
570 points (98.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54655 readers
594 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

That command prompt.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 251 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They could steal your personal data without you knowing.

Hah! Like the "legal" services are much better than that!

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 143 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hey now, the legal services tell you they're stealing your data. It's in section 9, subsection 14, paragraph 423 of the terms of service.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 50 points 1 month ago

It's 507 paragraphs long and written in a mix of German and Esperanto but yeah, it's right there! Clear as day!

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 23 points 1 month ago

Shoutout to Sony BMG putting rootkits in legally bought CDs.

Source: Wikipedia

You would be safer pirating.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 123 points 1 month ago

You should use legal streams that you pay for so you know they're stealing your personal data!

[–] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml 119 points 1 month ago (3 children)

does this mean if I pay for streaming my privacy will be respected

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 80 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] SatyrSack@feddit.org 60 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Huh, I didn't think emojis would be italicized. Interesting.

  • Normal: 🤔
  • Italicized: 🤔
  • Bold: 🤔
  • Strikethrough: ~~🤔~~
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 month ago

You dropped this - /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kissaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 103 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They could steal your personal data without you knowing.

So very ironic when it's the opposite between them.

[–] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 90 points 1 month ago (3 children)

so i went to their website. For a site thats immediate branding is about how scary and dangerous hackers are, you'd think their news section would be full of fraud and ransomware stories. instead, their "latest news" is solely articles about people being arrested for using pirate streaming services or selling loaded firesticks.

The single exception to this is a "social experiment" they allegedly did where they put a QR code up at the tube marked as "free streaming for life" and had people put pii in to sign up. This entire "initative" is solely another way to harvest user data lmao.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 month ago (5 children)

people being arrested for using pirate streaming services

What circumstances does that even happen in? Like a bar that plays a pirated sports stream?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

their “latest news” is solely articles about people being arrested for using pirate streaming services or selling loaded firesticks.

So just to be clear, the damage then is not from the actual piracy or due to any invasion from the source of the piracy, but rather 100% of the danger comes from the enforcement of piracy's prohibition.

Yes, definitely sounds like piracy is the problem here 🙄

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago

Don't do illegal drugs, kids! You could get in trouble, because they're illegal.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

social experiment" they allegedly did where they put a QR code up at the tube marked as "free streaming for life" and had people put pii in to sign up

It's insane that this is even legal.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org 76 points 1 month ago (2 children)

OK this hilarious. Guess who owns this domain. It is Sky UK

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sky are a bunch of bastards.

[–] JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago

They were bought by Comcast a number of years ago, so they're actually worse than before if you can believe it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 60 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

I went to their website just to have a laugh. This is some real shizo propaganda.

You could replace all of it with: Only watch self sourced pirated media! Paying and relying on any service has inherent risks

“1 in 3 (32%) people who illegally stream in the UK say they, or someone they know, have been a victim of fraud, scams, or identity theft as a result.”

320/1000 people know someone unlucky enough to fall for a scam.

This risk increases significantly when users exchange credit or debit card information to view content on unregulated and illicit websites.

If you pay for your pirated content you are doing it wrong.

Watching content via an illicit source can expose younger viewers to age-inappropriate content. These unauthorised websites, devices, apps, add-ons, and the content they can access have no parental controls.

My kids get a tablet exclusively pointing to a private media server in order to obtain the parental controls for-profit services just don’t provide. I banned YouTube kids, it was a shitfest.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 27 points 1 month ago (3 children)

320/1000 people know someone stupid enough to fall for a scam.

Correction: 320/1000 people know someone unlucky enough to fall for a scam. Plenty of very smart people fall for scams. All it takes is some lucky timing on the part of the scammer, where enough happens to be correct that they miss/overlook whatever tells might be present until it's too late

This risk increases significantly when users exchange credit or debit card information to view content on unregulated and illicit websites.

I mean, providing payment information to legitimate services is always a risk. There's so freaking many breaches that you simply have to assume your card will see fraudulent charges sooner or later and watch your statements for the unexpected activity so you can stop and reverse the charges before you miss the deadline

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 59 points 1 month ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 58 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Remember kids: Torrents and Jellyfin are the only way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xep@fedia.io 58 points 1 month ago (2 children)
C:\> They could steal your personal data without you knowing. </
At line:1 char:57
+ They could steal your personal data without you knowing. </
+                                                          ~
The '<' operator is reserved for future use.
    + CategoryInfo          : ParserError: (:) [], ParentContainsErrorRecordException
    + FullyQualifiedErrorId : RedirectionNotSupported
[–] Godort@lemm.ee 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well of course it errors out, you're using powershell rather than DOS

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

C:\> They could steal your personal data without you knowing. </

Access is denied.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 28 points 1 month ago

Proof my data is safe!

It's actually C:/> just to fuck your shit up.

[–] YourPrivatHater@ani.social 52 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The website is run by Skynews, wich is not directly disclosed on the website, the privacy options button doesn't work, it doesn't have a cookie banner but does set a cookie (illegal in EU), it has a injection for Facebook, Instagram and YouTube, by doing all that, they are less compliant to GDPR than my fucking piracy site...

All in all it looks like a intern made a WordPress website, designwise ok, but regarding legality, functionality and content its at best for printing it on toilet paper.

[–] Laristal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Legal stuff isn't much better these days. Advertisements unless you pau more, user tracking regardless, etc.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 month ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yea and when you legally stream the mouse can legally kill you

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Clarification: The Mouse as in Disney Corporation not as in the thing you use to move your pointer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] YourPrivatHater@ani.social 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are actually less prone to big data theft... "they could steal your personal data without you know"...while the "legal" streaming sites are stealing orders of Magnitude more wich is pretty clear by the amount of data they transmit, a website has usually no access to your contact info, your entire hard drive, the contact info of everyone in your contacts, your microphone or your camera.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 39 points 1 month ago

Lmao they even have the pre-1800 British flag on their site.

[–] whodoctor11@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They could steal your personal data without you knowing

lol

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

compared to legal sites stealing your personal data after telling you (it's buried among the 100+ pages TOS you agreed to)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] undefined@links.hackliberty.org 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You don’t use the C:/> </ terminal prefix and suffix prompt on your smartphone?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Last time I tried to stream a hockey game legally it just wouldn't ever load. I went back to the pirate stream.

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 month ago

You probably had to be using a Smart™ TV so they could steal your personal data.

[–] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 month ago

as opposed to the legal services where youre forced to hand it over along with paying exorbitant prices for a tiny catalogue

[–] jinarched@lemm.ee 31 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Legal Streams

Let Disney Kill your Family

C:> They could try to use terms and agreements to get away with murder.</

                                                                                            beFreePirate.fu
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ted@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You wouldn't download a torrent

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

More crime is committed in the making of media than in pirating it.

Also more wrongdoing against society and the public that the justice department couldn't be bothered with (so doesn't count as crime).

Pirate it all or don't watch it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 24 points 1 month ago (4 children)

This actually happened to me once. I illegally streamed a show and then this Italian guy Vinnie the Foot blasts through my screen. Nice guy. Asked for a towel, I made him an espresso, we watched movies and smoked cigars til sunrise.

[–] Steak@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Fuckin Vinnie. He stole my dad's toupée my dad is still pissed about that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 18 points 1 month ago

If it wasn't across a train line it'll make more sense if someone plaster over the "il" in "illegal"

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 17 points 1 month ago

"1 in 10 people believe they are not at risk when using illicit sources to watch TV, film or sports."

ONE in ten? Man, they're even bad at cherry picking statistics 😂

They even cite a study with only 1,000 participants for their statistic that "32% OF PEOPLE HAVE BEEN VICTIMS OF FRAUD"

In the title, at least. The body of that claim's card says that it's the people, or someone they know that have been victims of fraud.

Gosh, I hate dishonest scare marketing campaigns.

[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have one of these on a billboard near my house. Every time I feel sad, I just look up to it as I'm passing by and it gives me a chuckle. I think they actually updated it recently. These posters are in the UK for anyone wondering. And this one in particular is in the London Underground.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 14 points 1 month ago

Legal streams let something worse than criminals in. Lawful criminals.

load more comments
view more: next ›