this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
581 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59495 readers
3041 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 288 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (29 children)

"Time to switch to uBlock Lite or another ad blocker"

No. Time to switch to Firefox or derivative such as Librewolf.

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 31 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Unfortunately I'm stuck with Chrome at work so having something like Ublock Lite available is somewhat helpful. I just hope it still blocks youtube ads because they're the worst.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 80 points 1 week ago

I strongly suspect that is exactly what they're trying to stop.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You can't run firefox --profile /somewhere or (Windows) Firefox portable?

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

You should be able to bring up about:profiles in your browser and set up and launch profiles from there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] moe93@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I am running a portable LibreWolf on my work issued, locked-down-with-a-chastity-belt-and-thrown-the-keys-into-the-fires-of-Mount-Doom-in-Mordor laptop with uBlock extension installed.

Try that and see if it works.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

when I swapped my laptops, I already had chrome on the newer ones which I'm still using, but when I heard about this ublock origin saga, I started putting all my passwords in protonpass, and customised my Firefox install to my liking, CSS and everything. All ready to switch now, and I'm gonna be thanking my past self profusely for actually choosing to switch instead of vegetating.

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 167 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Chrome only exists to download Firefox.

[–] trespasser69@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Just like how Micro$oft Windows is advertsiting Linux, Google Chrome advertsites Firefox!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zarlin@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

winget install firefox

No chrome (or edge) needed

[–] daddy32@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CatZoomies@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Microsoft Edge: “Thank you, Chrome, for sharing the load.”

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Sad saga, but here we are. I remember when Chrome was new and brought much needed speed and low resource usage to the browsing experience of the day. I even got email from a Chrome engineer once about a bug I mentioned in a forum, asking me for more information.

Google was already an ad company by then so anyone could have looked forward to this inevitability. Some did. Most of us did not.

Chrome has just always been there for some younger people but it will now live in my memory as a fully encapsulated end-to-end enshittification experience that I really should have always expected.

And just like it used to be with Internet Explorer, I am forced to use Chrome at work all day because thats the IT & security approved / enterprise-managed browser.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gloria@sh.itjust.works 109 points 1 week ago

Google Chrome's ~~uBlock Origin~~ phaseout has begun

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 91 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My phaseout of Chrome was complete a long time ago.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I never phased into Chrome

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 11 points 1 week ago

I used it for a while. It honestly was a really good browser for a long time but since everything started going this shit it quickly fell from my good graces.

The only time I even think of missing it is when I have to open a page that is optimized against Firefox on purpose because the developers decided to use some janky Javascript plugin and didn't test.

[–] LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world 81 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm glad I don't use that piece of shit.

Firefox or nothing.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Been using Firefox for as long as I can remember now. Never had a reason to switch away, and I'm feeling rather vindicated.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] baatliwala@lemmy.world 65 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] piecat@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Just wait, there will be "features" that are mandatory on most sites, only supported in chrome.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago

I've dropped websites over less.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

then I won't be visiting those sites I guess

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 49 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I feel like I have seen this news since forever, I am happily living my life with Firefox... Although the android mobile really needs some love.

[–] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 18 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Oh man. Once Firefox on Android got extension support, I hopped on that train so hard. No ads on mobile browser? Heck yeah.

[–] Nanabaz2@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (5 children)

It has extensions support for like 6 years at this point. Unless you got some extreme obscure extensions

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Eh, Firefox on Android works pretty well for me (I actually use Mull). There are a handful of websites that have issues, but many of them also have issues on Vanadium (Chromium on GrapheneOS), so I just use my desktop for those.

What issues are you running into?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 33 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And my phaseout of Chrome is complete. My two browsers are now Firefox and Edge. Bit surprised at the latter tbh but it seems reasonably adequate as a secondary browser.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My understanding is that Edge is Chromium and will also eventually be impacted by this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Edge isn't really better in any way. It's both Google and Microsoft, like the marriage of awful

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nh5@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Between Manifest V3 and the Play Integrity API, Google is really trying hard to kill the open internet and android.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

I have always used Firefox on all my devices, except for one: the Chromebook I was forced to buy because of compatibility with my college's test proctoring spyware.

On that device, not only did uBlock Origin quit working the other day, but today Chrome even kept disabling uBlock Lite with the error message that "This extension reloaded itself too frequently". It could be some kind of legitimate bug, but it sure feels a lot like foul play on Google's part.

[–] aLaStOr_MoOdY47@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Stopped using that garbage browser a couple of weeks ago. Hardened Firefox ftw. Just using stock Firefox isn't enough if you're concerned about your privacy on the internet btw. If all you're looking for is an ad free experience tho, then stock Firefox should be enough.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] iii@mander.xyz 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Chrome is the adblock-block? You might have outblocked me today, but I'll firefox you away!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] raldone01@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I don't understand why all these chrome derivatives and firefox don't just band together and extend manifest v3 with some vendored standardised extension that addresses the limitations.

Browsers do that for CSS and JavaScript features already. An extension could just check if the browser supports the "unlimited filters" option and use it if its available.

I have never researched it but heard that the permissions of manifest v3 are much better for privacy.

I am in favor of removing manifest v2 if the vendored extension becomes a reality.

Browsers already have too much complexity, lines of code and feature creep.

[–] mint_tamas@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Firefox implements v3 without the restrictions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Defaced@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Firefox is the solution people, make the switch.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] flemtone@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Firefox with uBlock Origin add-on will sort many chrome issues.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

It's totally ok. I've phased Chrome out in the beginning of the year already.

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 13 points 1 week ago

the company said it would start turning off Manifest V2 extensions

...in time for Black Friday & the holiday sales?

load more comments
view more: next ›