this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
351 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

59772 readers
3115 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Silicon Valley wants us to believe that their autonomous products are a kind of self-guided magic, but the technology is clearly not there yet. A quick peak behind the curtain has consistently revealed a product base that, at a minimum, is still deeply reliant on human workforces.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

If it were any other company I'd play American taxi cab simulator.

[–] jettrscga@lemmy.world 110 points 3 days ago (7 children)

This sounds exactly like Amazon's "Just walk out" grocery store concept that actually required remote supervising by workers in India.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 39 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

We DO NOT want Indians remote driving cars in America holy shit.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

But they are self-driving. DON'T YOU DARE not appreciate that!

/s

[–] sit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

Amazon stopped being able to deliver working products in 2016

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's just like the indoor farm factory things, eventually everyone realises it's too expensive

Cost of car + remote driver infrastructure + remote driver (minimum) wage will be much higher than simpler car + local driver

[–] renzev@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Now we just have to wait for some startup to pitch "local drivers" as a revolutionary new idea.

Introducing the most groundbreaking innovation in transportation since the invention of the wheel: Human-Powered Chauffeur Experience (HPCE). Say goodbye to the soulless, algorithm-driven monotony of self-driving cars and hello to the warm, beating heart of a human taxi driver.

Imagine being whisked away to your destination by a charming, witty, and (mostly) alert individual who can engage in conversation, offer personalized recommendations, and even provide a sympathetic ear when you need it most. Our HPCE drivers are trained in the ancient art of navigation, able to adapt to unexpected road closures, and possess an uncanny ability to find the best route to your favorite coffee shop.

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 1 points 7 hours ago

You missed the part about AI - Actual Intelligence

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 87 points 3 days ago

Mechanical Turks are my favorite trope of the 2020s.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 27 points 3 days ago

This always the solution to these big, over promised AI projects... "what if i just pay someone a pittance to do the hard part."

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 41 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Musk is a little whiney bitch that can't hold his word. Full autonomous my ass. His words are all lies.

[–] makuus@pawb.social 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What’s hilariously tragic is that he could very likely have his full self-driving if he would just shut his shit-spewing asshole of a mouth for a hot second, and spend some of his ungodly billions on the problem.

There are incredibly bright people out there who can make this stuff a reality. But, it takes paying them well, not shit-talking or overruling them, and giving them the environment for success—e.g., not taking away the radar from the cars.

He just wants to talk a big game without spending any real effort or money on the problem. And, it’s just sad, because he could have his FSD and look like a genius.

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The lidar drama is why Tesla without Musk could overtake global EV market, but they have him.

[–] makuus@pawb.social 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It may well be a matter of opinion whether Tesla, even operating at its highest potential, could now overtake the likes of BYD, which is getting extensive help from its government. But, it’s reasonably clear that Tesla’s chances get thinner with every bad decision of Musk’s.

He fucked with the engineering, chasing pennies on critical components, like the lidar. He fucked with the crown jewel of the company—its Supercharger network—by destroying the team, and thereby slowing down rollouts and critical maintenance. He ran his mouth off and chased away folks—like me—who would have otherwise bought, by espousing pants-on-head-crazy crypto-bro viewpoints. Hell, his idea of PR is a poop emoji auto-responder.

It’s just frustrating to see such a great concept—the ubiquitous electric car—be fucked up so badly by the person with the most means to succeed.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It is almost like he is not a genius and just has generational wealth.

I mean when was the last time "the person who knows the most about manufacturing in the world" spent all their free time doing drugs, posting on Twitter, and fucking his employees trying to pump out kid number thirteen.

There is a word for someone who fucks it all up but still is left holding the money. Conman, that is the word.

[–] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago

Don't forget about spending thousands of hours in Diablo 4. And now he's eyeing up Path of Exile 2.

Hard working my ass, he spends more time on Twitter than I do at work.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago (3 children)

To be fair it is probably not on purpose. He is just too stupid to make realistic estimates of what will be possible.

It is on purpose. It started with his first POS company, Zip2, when he built a fake chassis to make their server look bigger and more powerful to investors.

[–] RedEyeFlightControl@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

We have this requirement called truth in advertising, but it doesn't seem to apply to billionaires.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 25 points 3 days ago

Remotely-driven robotaxis seem like the worst option available. I'm imagining a whole cubicle farm LARPing GTA5.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

The job post also notes that such a teleoperation center requires “building highly optimized low latency reliable data streaming over unreliable transports in the real world.” Tele-operators can be “transported” into the robotaxi via a “state-of-the-art VR rig,” it adds.

Oh man that's pretty hilarious for "autonomous vehicles"

Tesla would not be the first robotaxi company to use this method. In fact, it’s an industry standard. It was previously reported that Cruise, the robotaxi company owned by General Motors, was employing remote human assistants to troubleshoot when its vehicles ran into trouble

Oh, so this is actually completely normal and should not be news worthy...

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Remote human intervention when automated systems fail should be expected and required to be honest with current technology. There are simply too many edge cases in the real world, even with the trillions of miles Tesla has trained their system on.

[–] TheFrogThatFlies@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (4 children)

When will the intervention be called upon? How we react is defined by the context we have. Imagine being dropped into a pre accident situation without any context.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Remote human intervention when automated systems fail should be expected and required to be honest with current technology.

The "human in the loop" is one of those things that sounds good but isn't at all in reality.

https://pluralistic.net/2024/10/30/a-neck-in-a-noose/

A human was literally sitting at the wheel as Uber's taxi ran someone over.

Driving is nothing but edge cases, and that's why maybe paying drivers to drive people around is better than some half-baked AI driving people under trucks and hoping a call center employee is paying enough attention to bail them out.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

It's normal in the industry but the industry likes to tell the public otherwise so from time to time these articles pop up.

Amazon's just walk out shop, with AI looking with cameras what you bought, was actually run by indians remotely because the automation didn't quite work. Food delivery robots are run by people in low cost areas. Over guy runs multiple robots with a pont-and-click interface. That kind of thing. I'm sure autonomy is worked on but it's not fully autonomous yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

Fake it till you make enough investor money to hire remote humans

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To take a job at Tesla is to be ok with getting shitcanned at any time for any reason

[–] Aermis@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

So most like any job these days

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 3 days ago
[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 3 days ago

Space Karen is a fraud

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

It's been 7 hours of driving random people around the city, name after name I'll forget quick, then I see a name that brings my blood to a boil, an old bully/tormentor, I take over the car and deliver the script perfectly, he doesn't remember my voice, why would he? We head off and he zones out staring at his phone, completely oblivious to the fact he is heading towards his doom, we come to a train line and my internet connection 'drops', causing the vehicle to come to a complete stop, a minute later a large train smashes into a the car, completely destroying it and killing them before I can successfully reconnect to them.

And that's how to get away with murder.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It seems you've thought this through. Did you get an interview yet?

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 11 points 3 days ago

Just waiting on my video interview.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

Oh look, Crazy Taxi in real life!

[–] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

What if your robot was just a guy?

[–] lemon@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Preferred prior experience: Midtown Madness (100+ hours), GTA (100+ hours), or comparative driving simulators.

[–] GrabtharsHammer@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hey hey hey, it’s time to make crrrazy money! Are you ready?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mehdi_benadel@lemmy.balamb.fr 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Experience on Carmaggedon is also a plus.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Eh. There are driverless taxis working really well in some cities already. I felt very safe riding in a waymo. Tesla is way late to that party, who cares?

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 26 points 3 days ago (2 children)

A Waymo looks like this. The Tesla robotaxi looks like this - see anything missing?
That's right, all the sensors and hardware required to make safe, functioning autonomous car.

As long as Tesla keeps listening to the fundamentally flawed idea of Musk that "Humans drive using only their eyes, therefore autonomous cars don't require anything except a camera", they are destined to fail, as that system can't prevent crashing into things if it doesn't understand what it is looking at.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HIMISOCOOL@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

So... Trains?

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I guess it's not for live driving? The ping of any connection can't be good enough for that?

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I guess it's not for live driving?

Oh yes, it is. They mean business.

The ping of any connection can't be good enough for that?

The internet infrastructure of any really existing city is not good enough if just a few thousand cars "suddenly" become unable to self-drive, and therefore need these thousands of remote guys with their VR glasses.

Or, maybe there will be only 50 of these VR guys anyway, and so it takes, let's say, 20 hours to move 1000 cars, or 60 hours to move 3000 cars...

BTW How much food and water do you carry in your car, usually?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›