this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
936 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

79355 readers
4201 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Apple CEO Tim Cook plans to donate $1 million to Donald Trump's inauguration fund, reports Axios. The donation will be a personal donation directly from Cook rather than a donation from Apple”

I’ll defend Apple as being the least shitty of the big tech giants but I can’t defend this.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fades@lemmy.world 329 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Pathetic thinly veiled bribe

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 151 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or it is protection money. “Nice apple you got there, would be a shame if anyone took a bite out of that”….

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would Tim Cook be assosiated with Apple in trumps mind?

Apple is owned by Tim Apple.

Kind of strange that this line cook is able to afford a small 1 million dollar loan.......what? You think trump knows that a loan is different than a donation? You think he knows you're supposed to pay back loans?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If any company could insulate itself from Trump's agenda, it would be Apple with its "fuck you" money.

This is cowardly and craven.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dink@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Needs to make sure there’s a loophole for Apple production when more China tariffs hit.

[–] RubberDuck@lemmy.world 142 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Imagine being a woman working for Apple and having a CEO who funds a rapist.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 151 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Imagine being an openly gay CEO who funds a party who hates gays

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 63 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

No, they hate all gay people. They are just lower on the list right now, but they are definitely there.

First they came for....

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rauls4@lemm.ee 125 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 83 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is one of the reasons why I am gradually untying myself from the Apple ecosystem, and all of propriety/big tech; especially US based.

When push comes to shove capitalism will not resist fascism. They will ignore all stated virtue signals and choose profits.

Choosing E2E encrypted FOSS products, that are interoperable with FOSS standards/formats and do not lock you into walled gardens, are the only viable long term solution.

[–] rauls4@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This might actually become the year of Linux on the desktop for me.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bulwark@lemmy.world 111 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Amazon, Meta, Uber, OpenAI's Sam Altman, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Coinbase, Toyota, Ford, GM, AT&T, Black & Decker, and Charter Communications are also making donations to Trump's inauguration fund.

I guess I never really paid attention before but is it normal for companies to donate to an inauguration fund? It sure seems like a government sanctioned protection racket.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 85 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why does such a thing as an inaugural fund exist? Seems like it's just to facilitate more corruption!

[–] m4xie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't usually. The 'why' in the case is because Trump and his team refuse to sign the ethics agreement to get the normal funding from the government.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Thanks, it must be amazing for Americans to have a president who won't sign a standard ethics agreement.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jinni@sh.itjust.works 79 points 1 year ago (14 children)

As a Bi man there is something that particularly stings about a well known, openly gay CEO funding a man who is hateful towards LGBTQ+ people. I never really liked him nor apple but it is an extra fuck you.

Being rich is ultimately the disease as it compels him to appeal to power but I hope the last things hears is "Told you I would kill you last".

[–] UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

His in-group is not LGBTQIA+, it is other rich people. The same is true for all of them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] jared@mander.xyz 74 points 1 year ago

Fuck Tim Apple

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 72 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It really is a class war, not a culture war.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JamesFire@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago (22 children)

I’ll defend Apple as being the least shitty of the big tech giants but I can’t defend this.

Why would you do that though? The only thing I'm aware of that they do even remotely better than anyone else is privacy. But it's not that much better, and it comes at the cost of gestures at everything else

[–] ratel@mander.xyz 48 points 1 year ago (3 children)

IDK why people say they have better privacy: They just settled a lawsuit over evesdroping using Siri. I think they probably have less interest than Google in selling data for advertising, mostly likely using it internally for their ecosystem so they probably come across more privacy focused but I assume they snoop just as much as any other big tech company.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 66 points 1 year ago (8 children)

All these Billionaires PAYING Trump MILLIONS of Dollars is PROOF he CANT be Bought!

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Gork@lemm.ee 65 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not going to make him remember your actual name, Tim.

You'll always be Tim Apple to him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 58 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Have inauguration funds always been a thing? Or is this a Trump thing? What’s the purpose?

I can understand campaign funds. But if you’ve won I don’t know if I understand a candidate specific donation after the fact.

[–] bluemellophone@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Previous administrations have used special government funds that are dedicated to the transition and inauguration. This comes with obvious restrictions and ethics requirements since it is taxpayer money.

Trump has decided to not use this money and get donations instead, which allows him and his incoming administration to skirt the normal mandatory reporting, disclosures, and rules.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

It's tribute to the new emperor hoping that he won't go after them. Gotta play nice while they can.

[–] LuckyPierre@lemm.ee 58 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They're being shaken down. Same as Mark Zuckerberg being summoned to a meeting with Trump and the next day paying $1m to the same fund.

I'm betting these meetings went something like, "You don't want a president as an enemy, do you? Cough up."

And don't think of it as a tax on the rich - it's not going towards the benefit of the American people. It's extortion.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

These CEOs are funding hate, violence and the end of American democracy - they have enough power, money and influence to oppose, yet they don't. They decided that a few must be sacrificed for the greater ~~good~~ profit.

Something happened on the 4th of December. Today is the 4th of January. Just in case anyone's calendar app is stuck closed. Interesting if true...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This country makes me sick to my stomach. What a fucking joke.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 39 points 1 year ago

Gross. Sick of rich assholes enabling the fascist.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 39 points 1 year ago

The personal donation part is weird. This sounds like a deliberate attempt to appease the fascists while trying, desperately, to maintain Apple's image.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Absolutely disgusting

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Paying his tribute to the king. He'll have to donate more if he wants to usurp Elon. How much has Zuck donated?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No matter how much money they spend on this party they're still celebrating putting a convicted con man in the White House - whoopeee! - while the chumps who voted for him say, "What... my meds aren't covered anymore?"

Congratulations on flushing your country down a solid gold toilet, "conservatives".

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

$1 million seems to be the going fealty price for these people.

[–] TheLastOfHisName@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Paying largesse/protection money.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago

Typical CEO tribute to the newly crowned King of the United States for some tariff exemptions.

load more comments
view more: next ›