this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
232 points (92.0% liked)

Technology

61203 readers
5621 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 202 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Meanwhile, American users are flocking to RedNote because authorities have worked themselves into a lather over privacy concerns about TikTok, while U.S. tech giants harvest user data with industrial efficiency. The difference? American data collection is done for profit, and Chinese data collection is done for control. Pick your poison.

Hard to argue Zuck and Elon don't want control either...

[–] fan0m@lemmy.world 96 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

I’d argue profit and control are two sides of the same coin

[–] ElderReflections@fedia.io 23 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

"In this country, you gotta make the money first. Then when you get the money, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the women."

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Then, when all your desires are fullfilled, you realize that your life is empty because nobody around you actually gives a shit about you and are only using you as a connection to money and/or power. You end up a soulless husk of a human being whose only goal in life is line go up.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Isn't it the exact opposite? The only thing China can do with my data is try to sell me stuff. Meanwhile, the authorities in my own country have the power to kick in my door and drag me away to some blacksite.

If I were Chinese, I would rather the US government have my data than the Chinese government, but since I'm American, I would rather the Chinese government have it than the US. Pretty much everyone anywhere in the world ought to regard their own government as their highest security risk.

[–] WhatSay@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 week ago

The only thing China can do with my data is try to sell me stuff.

Anyone that collects your data could use it for many legal and illegal activities. If you see it only as marketing, you are not imagining the possibilities of stolen identity, fraud, blackmail, etc.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] coherent_domain@infosec.pub 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

How do people not think that China is also a hyper capitalistic society, especially in the tech sector. Your data is 100% being sold if you are on any Chinese platform, just like in the U.S.

If anything, Chinese big tech tends to be less privacy-respecting than the west, because they don't need to operate in area with basic privacy laws, like Europe and California; and there are much less alternative products to choose from because of the GFW.

The founder and CEO of Baidu openly stated that "Chinese people are less sensitive about privacy, which gives us more data to work with" See https://m.163.com/dy/article/DDRTB01Q0511FQO9.html?spss=adap_pc

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They all operate under the same laws in any given area. And neither respect your privacy if not forced by laws that are actually enforced.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The difference? American data collection is done for profit, and Chinese data collection is done for control. Pick your poison.

No the difference is that these US companies give the US government a backdoor into everyone's data (while also harvesting it all for profit) while the Chinese apps don't in favor of giving the Chinese government a backdoor into everyone's data. They don't give a shit about propaganda and brainwashing occurring which is why they'll allow the app to stay up in the US just so long as it's an American company controlling it here because then they can install their backdoor for the US government.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 weeks ago

profit is simply a means of seeking control...

[–] kid2908@slrpnk.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

The article talks about how America is mirroring China's tactic. So yeah, now they want control too.

[–] takeda@lemm.ee 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is crystal clear now, but it was less clear before.

I started saying that social media finally figured out how to monetize the platform and it's customers aren't people, aren't even companies, the customers are now billionaires and foreign governments.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

foreign governments

The influence of foreign governments is negligible next to what the US exerts on us. Americans have the jester's privilege, we can say whatever we want, as long as they know it doesn't matter. As soon as the government feels like it matters, they have a million tools to silence you.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah, this may have been true before the upcoming administration, but Trump's government (which will be a full-blown oligarchy) absolutely wants Chinese/Russian style control over its citizens.

[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 79 points 2 weeks ago

"This massive corporation sucks too!" Have you tried not going with a massive corporation?

[–] Rottcodd@lemmy.world 62 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The only winners in this scenario are governments that want more control over their citizens' digital lives.

And that, as the saying goes, is not a bug. It's a feature.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Man I wish European governments would take more control of our digital town squares that are entirely owned and handled by foreign corporations who seek to erode democracy.

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 54 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

What happens when Americans start posting about Hong Kong not being a part of China?

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 67 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

You mean mainland Taiwan? Never heard of this China.

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 8 points 2 weeks ago

Judea and Samaria agree.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The same as already happens on lemmy.ml 😂

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Really? Let me try.

Hong Kong isn't part of China. Taiwan is an independent country.

Edit: oh, this community is in lemmy.world, not lemmy.ml. Still, for those disgruntled, report me for rule 2 & 6. I want to see how mods respond to this.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 weeks ago (17 children)

Tibet is completely forgotten 😢

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 22 points 2 weeks ago

The same as when Americans posted about the gaza genocide on tik tok, the government cracks down.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 10 points 2 weeks ago

Their account gets banned.

Same as any mention of Tienamen Square and anything else the Chinese Government deems unacceptable.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago

They'll probably get mocked and their posts removed.

load more comments (5 replies)

I mean, trying to regulate technology at the speed of American politics was very obviously a nonsensical and futile proposition from the get-go.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 weeks ago

**tearing everything apart

[–] don@lemm.ee 12 points 2 weeks ago

Anyone that knows anything about average TT users knew that if the ban was going to happen, that this was going to happen in some way, shape, or form.

[–] DigitalNirvana@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m pretty sure Xiao Hong Shu translates to Little Red Note in English. I’m not using it, just clarifying the name to make it seem small / cute. Aduki beans are Xiao hong dou.

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

First of all, the name doesn't translate to "Little Red Note", but "Little Red Book."

Second, Little Red Book is literally the nickname of a Chinese political publication called Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-tung.

Sorry, that name isn't cute at all.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

LOL my god, it's really that in-your-face blatant?!

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think most people know it too. They protest because they have already got hacked a dozen or two times, advertisers steal all data not locked down, and the government scoops up all of that. So they question "what can China do to me that hasn't already been done. My data and privacy has already been made worthless"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's actually just a funny coincidence, though it's funny when people freak out about it. Mao's "little red book" is written 红宝书, while the app is 小红书, so the connection is only really there in English. Red is a reference to two institutions the creator was involved with, Stanford Business School and Bain & Company, both of which use red as their main color (I imagine the general association of red with good luck may have factored in as well). As for note vs book, I mean, a notebook is a "little book," and note is short for notebook (e.g. Death Note).

If you actually look at the app and what gets posted there and what doesn't, it's pretty silly to assume it's a reference. It was originally called "Hong Kong Shopping Guide" and was targeted towards tourists, the userbase skews female and relatively well off. It's like Instagram, there's lots of cat posts and the the like, lots of fashion, I've come across some pretty impressive furries, and it's even got a decent sized queer community, particularly popular with lesbians.

Even if it were an intentional reference to Mao's book, like, so what? The users are the ones putting out content and they're just regular people. Not everything is some sinister plot.

load more comments
view more: next ›