this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
735 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

61203 readers
5621 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 182 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Shit, we should also ban insta, fb, and google places while we’re at it.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 71 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't tempt me with a good time.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 11 points 1 week ago

Actually, be very tempted please! Get 'm!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 82 points 1 week ago (6 children)

The reason we have a Chinese competitor that we cannot directly control is that Meta is buying up every promising US platform and shutting it down. Or just trying to copy it so that the competitor does not get enough users

[–] coherent_domain@infosec.pub 45 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

As if anti-trust law doesn't exist. It is crazy to me nowadays, most tech startup's goal from the very start is to sale to a big tech competitor. This certainly should have anti-trust implications.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] arbitrary_sarcasm@lemmy.world 68 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Media headlines that use the word lobbying probably do it so that people don't take up arms. If they were to instead call it bribery, I think a lot more people would take issue with the whole process.

[–] ramirezmike@programming.dev 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

they can't really do that because that would be defamation and they would be sued for it. Bribery is a crime and while it is effectively the same as lobbying from our perspective, one is legal and one is not and a media outlet can't just accuse someone of a crime without evidence unless they want to close up shop

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

When in practice Corruption is not investigated or prosecuted, nobody ever gets convicted of Corruption, the Media can't talk about Corruption as it would otherwise be defamation, hence the country has no Corruption.

I haven't lived in the US but I lived in the UK and this was exactly how Britain had "no Corruption".

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Except the only thing that will be prosecuted, or adjudicated, is the claim of libel entered by Meta, for suggesting their millions are anything other than legal contributions to something or other.

There is a solution, though, staring us all right in the face.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah.

Those of us paying attention have spotted long ago that the Ju$tice System is mainly a tool for violent enforcement of the power of the moneyed and well-connected elites on the majority of the population behind a charade of "rules are rules" and it being just an independent and a fair mechanism for equal application of the "rules defined by Society" to all (all of which is nowadays and in a painlfully obvious way, clearly a bundle of lies).

All it takes is comparing how the Ju$tice System reacts to merelly the peons breaching uneven contracts with big companies or to the occupation of the property of the very wealthy by the poor, compared to how it reacts to violent crime in poor neighbourhoods, to see how their Ju$tice is not in any way form or shape Fair or Just.

Maybe it's less so in some countries and more so in others, but nowhere is it actually fair and independent.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CthuluVoIP@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago (13 children)

So what does Zuck do when Trump uses an exec order to stay the ban and pushes Republicans to reverse it?

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 43 points 1 week ago

Algorithmically quell his own cybernetic rage.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's already back up lmfao

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yep. But this doesn't answer their question. I'm rooting for a Tik Tok CEO vs Meta CEO battle Royale at the inauguration.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Tom just sitting on the sidelines, eating popcorn.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kerr@aussie.zone 6 points 1 week ago

Trumps just gonna keep him hanging hoping he’s in the inner circle and bleeding him dry in the process.

[–] ansiz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

If Zuck gives Trump more money then why would he? Probably would just allow Meta to buy it or something dumb like that.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well we knew it had to be something. I mean most of Congress is too old to know what a tik tok is.

[–] bokherif@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

They’re just too old for everything. They’re almost part of ancient history.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Tic Tac Toe!

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Headlines that basically say the same shit twice really are swell.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

“lobbing”

is this a trusted outlet? at least we can be pretty sure a human wrote it ha ha ha

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well it is called readsludge.com

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I would also like to lob Congress.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] d00ery@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

“Issues related to voter suppression/interference, political ads and misinformation policies.”

It's nice to see meta have learned from their own mistakes and are now trying to protect ~~democracy~~ profits.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook%E2%80%93Cambridge_Analytica_data_scandal

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think this was less about lobbying and more about bogeyman of China.

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (10 children)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 1 week ago
[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't know why I do this to myself, but I read through Meta's disclosure

Every single lobbyist I looked at worked in DC before becoming a lobbyist. I knew it happened a lot, but it's really depressing to see

Also, why do these disclosures not require companies to specify how the money was spent? There are only ~20 different lobbyists mentioned, and Meta spent 7.6M in a single quarter

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

This is why we gotta ban TikTok!!!!! \s

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago

$7.6 million, pocket change to these chumps. Up the ante!

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Sad trombone.

load more comments
view more: next ›