this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
104 points (94.1% liked)

Technology

61825 readers
3055 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago

Encrypt everything. Show these fascist politicians and their laws the middle finger.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 30 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Apple’s iCloud backups aren’t encrypted by default,

Why the fuck not?

[–] Slax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

People aren't as technically intelligent as most of us on here.

Most companies haven't put up proper MFA with apps and rely on SMS. Imagine they used security codes to recover their data from Apple ...

[–] AcesFullOfKings@feddit.uk 29 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

This comes up every so often. By default they're not fully encrypted because people are bad at managing their accounts and they expect apple to be able to recover their account/backup/data when they forget their password, which happens all the time for non-techy people. I believe the backups are encrypted at rest, but it's encrypted with a key that apple has so they can recover it if needed. The support burden of "no really we can't recover your data bc we encrypted it" when someone is in the process of losing all of their photos/messages/etc isn't worth it. And tbh I kind of agree with this compromise.

You can turn on the option to fully encrypt the cloud backup, and you click through a warning that says apple can't recover the data if you forget your pw. I think this is reasonable bc if you care you can just turn that on.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

It's important to note here that even if you turn on this option, Apple does not support full end-to-end encryption, there are still multiple factors that they keep under standard data protection which means they still have the encryption keys. They keep this under the guise of deduplication so they can save on storage costs but some examples of this are:

  • the apps+file formats you have installed
  • your phone's make model and serial number
  • most metadata that defines what an item represents such as date time modification time
  • all file checksums (this is scary imo)

They explain how everything with their encryption works here

[–] towerful@programming.dev 1 points 33 minutes ago (1 children)

My experience of checksums are in things like serial where they can potentially recover a corrupt bit.
I presume in the case of encryption, a checksum is more of a hash of the raw data? Like a one-way deterministic compute. Easy to get a hash of data, extremely difficult to get data from a hash.
In which case, it's fine. Passwords are hashed (granted, multiple times), but a cryptographically secure hash is not to be underestimated.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 minutes ago* (last edited 9 minutes ago)

You are correct, my concern with it isn't retrieving the data however, its the possibility that if the person involved had the means to, they could have a table of check-sums of files of interest. This system could be used to confirm or deny a file of interest is present on the device.

For the everyday person this is a non-issue, but from a privacy POV you should not be able to get any information in regards to what a file is.

Rainbow tables for password cracking works off a similar system, they take a bunch of commonly used passwords, hash them and compare them to leaked databases. If the hash matches an account you have the password. Most password handlers get around this by salting it, and hashing it repeatedly X amount of times, but I doubt that apple would do that for a checksum(and regardless they would know X and how it was made).

Again though I acknowledge that it's a paranoia level concern, but I still am firm that a true encryption solution should not be able to get any type of info out of it that may help the third party.

[–] BenDoubleU@lemmy.radio 16 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Is there an article/source for this, or is it just a pic of a phone with a lock on it?

[–] pls@lemmy.plaureano.nohost.me 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] L3s@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

@Picasso@thelemmy.club Could you post that in the body for us?

We're getting reports of this not being news/an article

[–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] L3s@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Matrix.org is in trouble as they’re hosted in the UK.

[–] pls@lemmy.plaureano.nohost.me 5 points 8 hours ago